The BBC, however, said its intelligence source didn't dispute the origin of the information, but said the agencies were skeptical of the claim (that weapons of mass destruction could be ready for use within 45 minutes). "The information which I'm told was dubious did come from the agencies, but they were unhappy about it because they didn't think it should have been in there," said BBC reporter Andrew Gilligan. "They thought it was not corroborated sufficiently, and they actually thought it was wrong. They thought the informant concerned had got it wrong, they thought he had misunderstood what was happening."
Regel: Man schreibt etwas in ein Dossier, von dem bekannt ist, dass es falsch ist (fuegt vielleicht sogar hinzu, dass dies falsch ist). Und zitiert dann, dass dies Wort-fuer-Wort im Dossier steht...