Green Logo of Bielefeld University
Faculty of Mathematics - Working group Bux
big picture big picture big picture big picture big picture big picture
small picture small picture small picture small picture small picture small picture
ende

Wednesday, 25 October 2017

Oihana Garaialde Ocaña: Counting problems in cohomology algebras of finite p-groups

Finite p-groups form a wild family and providing a general classification is instrinsically hard. In fact, only very small p-groups have been fully classified (up to isomorphism). One of the first steps to classify finite p-groups was given by Philip Hall, introducing a stronger notion than that of the isomorphism: isoclinism.
Later, back in the 90's, finite p-groups were classified by their coclass. Recall that a finite p-group G of size \( p^n \) and nilpotency class m has coclass n-m. Leedham-Green and Shalev proved independently that every p-group has a normal subgroup of nilpotency class 2 with index depending only on p and its coclass.
In this talk, we shall merge two important invariants of finite p-groups: coclass and cohomology. As cohomology of groups is an algebraic invariant, given two finite p-groups G and H with a common “good” group property, their cohomology rings should not tell them apart. In this direction, we pose the following problem:

Given an infinite family of finite p-groups \( \lbrace G_i \rbrace \) with a common “good” group property, deduce that there are only finitely many isomorphism types of algebras in \(\lbrace H^*(G_i;\mathbb F_p) \rbrace \).

We shall start introducing the cohomology ring \(\lbrace H^*(G_i;\mathbb F_p) \rbrace \) of a finite p-group, where \(\mathbb F_p\) denotes the finite field of p elements and we also present some well-known examples of such rings. Later, based on the classifcation of Leedham-Green, we shall study the aferomentioned problem for fnite p-groups of fixed coclass. Are there more "good" group properties?