Finiteness of pointed families of symplectic varieties: a geometric Shafarevich conjecture

Lie Fu Université de Strasbourg, IRMA, Strasbourg, France lie.fu@math.unistra.fr Zhiyuan Li Shanghai Center for Mathematical Sciences, Fudan University, 2005 Songhu Road 200438, Shanghai, China zhiyuan_li@fudan.edu.cn Teppei Takamatsu Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Saitama University, 255 Shimo-Okubo, Sakura-ku, Saitama-shi, Saitama 338-8570, Japan teppeitakamatsu.math@gmail.com  and  Haitao Zou Faculty of Mathematics, Universität Bielefeld
Universitätsstraße 25, 33615 Bielefeld, Germany
hzou@math.uni-bielefeld.de
Abstract.

We investigate in this paper the so-called pointed Shafarevich problem for families of primitive symplectic varieties. More precisely, for any fixed pointed curve (B,0) and any fixed primitive symplectic variety X, among all locally trivial families of -factorial and terminal primitive symplectic varieties over B whose fiber over 0 is isomorphic to X, we show that there are only finitely many isomorphism classes of generic fibers. Moreover, assuming semi-ampleness of isotropic nef divisors, which holds true for all hyper-Kähler manifolds of known deformation types, we show that there are only finitely many such projective families up to isomorphism. These results are optimal since we can construct infinitely many pairwise non-isomorphic (not necessarily projective) families of smooth hyper-Kähler varieties over some pointed curve (B,0) such that they are all isomorphic over the punctured curve B\{0} and have isomorphic fibers over the base point 0.

Key words and phrases:
Holomorphic symplectic varieties, Geometric Shafarevich conjecture, Finiteness of families, Period map, Cone conjecture
2020 Mathematics Subject Classification:
14J42 (Primary), 14D10, 14D23, 32Q45

1. Introduction

1.1. Hyperbolicity of moduli spaces and polarized Shafarevich conjecture

Let K be a number field and g2 an integer. In his ICM address, Shafarevich [75] conjectured that, up to isomorphism, there are only finitely many smooth projective curves of genus g over K with good reduction outside a fixed finite set of finite places of K. This was proven by Faltings in [20]. A geometric analogue where K is replaced by k(B) the function field of a smooth curve B over an algebraically closed field k of characteristic zero, was established earlier by Arakelov [5] and Paršin [69].

Faltings’ result can be reformulated as saying that the moduli stack 𝐌g of genus-g smooth projective curves is arithmetically hyperbolic over ¯. Recall that a separated Deligne–Mumford stack 𝐌 of finite type over a number field is called arithmetically hyperbolic over ¯, if 𝐌 has a model over some finitely generated subring A¯, such that for any finitely generated subring A¯ containing A, the set (A) of A-integral points on is finite; see [40].

There is a geometric analogue of the arithmetic hyperbolicity. Recall that a separated scheme or, more generally, a separated Deligne–Mumford stack 𝐌 of finite type over an algebraically closed field k of characteristic 0 is called geometrically hyperbolic if, for any pointed smooth integral curve (B,0) defined over k and any k-point x of 𝐌, there exist only finitely many morphisms

f:B𝐌

such that f(0)=x (see [37, Definition 2.1]).

The Lang–Vojta conjecture predicts a deep relation between arithmetic hyperbolicity and geometric hyperbolicity. Roughly speaking,

Arithmetic hyperbolic Geometric hyperbolic.

See Javanpeykar’s survey [40, §12] for an account of the progress towards this conjecture.

The search for evidence of the Lang–Vojta conjecture leads to profound results in arithmetic geometry. Combining some fundamental results in Hodge theory, one can show that a separated Deligne–Mumford stack 𝐌 that admits a quasi-finite period map is geometrically hyperbolic (see [37, Theorem 1.7]). In particular, the moduli spaces of polarized varieties satisfying the infinitesimal Torelli theorem are geometrically hyperbolic, e.g. moduli spaces of abelian varieties, K3 surfaces, and irreducible symplectic (hyper-Kähler) varieties, with a given polarization type. The arithmetic hyperbolicity of the following moduli spaces is established, verifying the Lang–Vojta conjecture:

  • moduli space of polarized abelian varieties, by Faltings [21, Theorem 3.1];

  • moduli space of polarized K3 surfaces and irreducible symplectic varieties, by André [4].

There exist many other families of (naturally polarized) varieties for which the analogue of Shafarevich’s conjecture for polarized pairs has been established; see the summary in [24, p. 2].

Inspired by the Lang–Vojta conjecture, Javanpeykar–Sun–Zuo proposed the pointed Shafarevich conjecture in [39, Conjecture 1.5] for polarized varieties with semiample canonical bundle. Recently, in [38], new finiteness results in this direction are obtained, which go beyond the situations where the infinitesimal Torelli theorem holds.

1.2. Beyond moduli spaces: unpolarized Shafarevich conjecture

From now on, we focus on abelian varieties and symplectic varieties (and their singular generalizations). Putting aside the interpretation using hyperbolicity of moduli spaces and going back to the original Shafarevich question, it is natural to ask about the finiteness of abelian schemes (of a fixed dimension) or symplectic varieties (of a fixed deformation type) over the base 𝒪K,S, the S-integers in a number field K, without assuming the existence of a polarization with a bounded degree. This strengthening of the (polarized) Shafarevich conjecture is the so-called unpolarized Shafarevich conjecture. As the name suggests, its extra difficulty stems from the lack of a polarization with uniformly bounded degree; hence, the class of varieties in question does not even fit into a single moduli stack of finite type.

The unpolarized Shafarevich conjecture for abelian varieties is solved by Zarhin’s trick; see [21, Remark, Reduction 1, p168]. For K3 surfaces, it is verified by She in [77] (see Takamatsu [80] for further discussions). For higher-dimensional smooth irreducible symplectic varieties of a fixed deformation type, the unpolarized Shafarevich conjecture, as well as its suitable cohomological variants, are proven in our previous work [24].

1.3. Geometric unpolarized Shafarevich conjecture

Regarding the interplay between Geometry and Arithmetic as in the Lang–Vojta conjecture, it is interesting to formulate and study the geometric analogue of the unpolarized Shafarevich conjecture. As in the definition of geometric hyperbolicity, the meaningful statement is about the finiteness of families over pointed curves. We formulate such a conjecture as follows for primitive symplectic varieties, the singular generalizations of projective hyper-Kähler varieties.

Pointed Shafarevich problem.

Let k be an algebraically closed field of characteristic 0. For a pointed smooth integral curve (B,0) and a primitive symplectic variety X defined over k, is the set

{𝒳𝜋B|π is a locally trivial family of primitive symplectic varieties with 𝒳0π1(0)X}/ ()

finite? Here 𝒳 is an algebraic space.

The families in (Pointed Shafarevich problem) are not required to be projective nor have a weak polarization of bounded degree. This leads to two main difficulties of this problem:

  1. (1)

    (Unboundedness) a priori, the set (Pointed Shafarevich problem) is not parametrized by a moduli stack of finite type over k.

  2. (2)

    (Non-separatedness) the relevant moduli problem is highly non-separated.

We stress that (1) implies that the pointed Shafarevich problem is not a direct consequence of the (arithmetic or geometric) hyperbolicity of some moduli stacks. Moreover, (2) can indeed lead to some intrinsic infiniteness: we construct in Proposition 6.2 infinitely many non-isomorphic families of smooth irreducible symplectic varieties over some pointed curve, such that they are all isomorphic over the punctured curve and have isomorphic fibers over the base point.

1.4. Main results

In this paper, we provide two results regarding the pointed Shafarevich problem for primitive symplectic varieties. The first one, Theorem 1.1, concerns only the finiteness of the generic fibers; the second one, Theorem 1.2, concerns only projective families.

Theorem 1.1.

Let (B,0) be a pointed smooth connected curve defined over an algebraically closed field k of characteristic 0. Let X be a -factorial terminal primitive symplectic variety over k.

  1. (1)

    If b2(X)4, then there are only finitely many isomorphism classes for the generic fibers of families in (Pointed Shafarevich problem);

  2. (2)

    If b2(X)=4, the same finiteness holds for non-isotrivial families in (Pointed Shafarevich problem).

Theorem 1.1 can be viewed as a geometric analogue of the (arithmetic) unpolarized Shafarevich conjecture proved in our previous work [24] (see also [4], [77], [80]). Moreover, it provides a generalization from hyper-Kähler manifolds to symplectic varieties with mild singularities. The proof of Theorem 1.1 will be given in Section 5 in the refined form of Theorem 5.1.

Theorem 1.2.

Under the assumptions of Theorem 1.1, define

Shaf(B,X){𝒳𝜋B|π is a flat and projective family of -factorial terminal primitive symplectic varieties satisfying π1(0)X}/.
  1. (1)

    If b2(X)4 and for any family 𝒳BShaf(B,X), all nef divisors on a very general fiber 𝒳b are semi-ample, then the set Shaf(B,X) is finite .

  2. (2)

    If b2(X)=4, the set Shaf(B,X) is finite when restricted to non-isotrivial families.

Since the semi-ampleness condition in Theorem 1.2, also known as the SYZ conjecture for hyper-Kähler manifolds (see Section 6.2), has been established for smooth hyper-Kähler varieties of known deformation types, we can obtain the following unconditional result:

Corollary 1.3.

If X is smooth of one of the known deformation types: K3[n], Kumn, OG6, or OG10, then the set Shaf(B,X) is finite.

Remark 1.4.

Some comments on the conditions in Theorem 1.1 and Theorem 1.2 are in order.

  1. (a)

    If any locally trivial family of primitive symplectic varieties over B admits a simultaneous -factorial terminalization over B, then the assumption that X is -factorial terminal in Theorem 1.1 can be removed. By [11, Proposition 5.22] or more generally [10, Corollary 2.29], such simultaneous -factorial terminalization exists locally around 0B.

  2. (b)

    By Namikawa [65], a flat family of primitive symplectic varieties with -factorial and terminal fibers is locally trivial.

  3. (c)

    By Theorem 1.1, there are only finitely many birational classes of pointed locally trivial families. To prove the finiteness of isomorphism classes in Theorem 1.2, we use the Kawamata–Morrison cone conjecture in the relative setting studied in [51], [52] and [34]. The hypothesis of semi-ampleness comes from their results; see Section 3.3 for details.

Motivated by the uniform Shafarevich conjecture for families of canonically polarized varieties (cf. [19, Theorem 3.1],[31, Theorem 1.2], [32, Theorem 1.3], [49, Corollary 6.5]), it is natural to ask whether in Theorem 1.2 there is a uniform upper bound, depending only on the topology of (B,0) and the deformation type of X, of the number of isomorphism classes of pointed projective families of primitive symplectic varieties. More precisely, we have the following question.

Question 1.5 (Uniform boundedness).

Let the notation be as in the Pointed Shafarevich Problem (Pointed Shafarevich problem). Fix a group Γ and fix a (locally trivial) deformation type M of primitive symplectic variety. Is there an integer N, depending only on Γ and M, such that

|Shaf(B,X)|N,

for any smooth pointed curve (B,0) with π1(B,0)Γ and any primitive symplectic variety X of the fixed deformation type M? A weaker problem is whether there exists such a uniform bound which depends only on Γ and X.

1.5. Strategy of proof and challenges

As mentioned before, the families in (Pointed Shafarevich problem) are not assumed to be projective. Assume that k=. We can endow their variations of Hodge structure with a weak polarization (see Definition 4.8 for the definition). Then, to reduce the proof to the polarized case, we need a kind of Zarhin’s trick for these polarized Hodge structures of K3-type to bound the degree of weak polarizations in the (Pointed Shafarevich problem). This will establish the finiteness of geometric isomorphism classes of the generic fiber in Theorem 1.1. Our approach builds on the uniform Kuga-Satake construction (see Theorem 5.2) developed in [77], [68] and [24]. This was central to our proof of the arithmetic Shafarevich conjecture for smooth irreducible symplectic varieties in [24]. However, when adapting this to the pointed Shafarevich problem, we encounter a new obstruction: the associated uniform Kuga–Satake families for locally trivial families in (Pointed Shafarevich problem) are not pointed by a same abelian variety. This difficulty is resolved through a novel argument leveraging the finiteness of lattice embeddings (Proposition 5.4).

In addition, to establish Theorem 1.1 and Theorem 1.2, we require the Kawamata–Morrison conjecture for primitive symplectic varieties over a non-algebraically closed field to deduce the finiteness of generic fibers and families. For the smooth case, this is proven by the third author in [81]. As a byproduct, in this paper, we prove the Kawamata–Morrison cone conjectures for -factorial primitive symplectic varieties (with b25) over a non-algebraically closed field whose singular locus Xsing has codimension 4 (see Theorem 3.5).

To extend the finiteness results to singular primitive symplectic varieties, we establish several foundational results concerning the algebraic structure of their moduli spaces. For example, the Matsusaka–Mumford theorem for locally trivial families of primitive symplectic varieties (Proposition 4.2) over a geometric curve. Our method here relies on the existence of simultaneous resolution of singularities in a locally trivial family, which is still missing when B is a general Dedekind scheme in positive or mixed characteristic. These developments constitute the technical core of our approach.

Conventions

Throughout this paper, we let k be an algebraically closed field of characteristic zero, unless otherwise noted. For an algebraic variety X over k, we denote by Xreg the regular locus of X. For any i, bi(X) denotes the i-th Betti number of X, that is, the dimension of the étale cohomology He´ti(X,) as -vector spaces. For a morphism XY we use Xy to denote the fiber at any point yY.

Acknowledgment:

We thank Ariyan Javanpeykar, Chen Jiang, Christian Lehn, Ben Moonen, Long Wang, Shou Yoshikawa, and Kang Zuo for helpful discussions. The authors T. Takamatsu and H. Zou gratefully acknowledge the kind hospitality and support of Tokyo University of Science, where part of this work was carried out. We are also grateful to anonymous referees for help comments.

2. Primitive symplectic varieties

2.1. Primitive symplectic varieties

In this section, we work more generally over a base field k of characteristic zero. We recall the following basic concepts of symplectic varieties in the singular setting, due to Beauville [15], Fujiki [26] (orbifold case), and Bakker–Lehn [11].

Definition 2.1.

A normal projective variety X over k is called a symplectic variety, if the regular locus Xreg carries a non-degenerate closed algebraic 2-form σ, such that there exists a resolution of singularities π:YX such that πσ extends to an algebraic 2-form on Y.

A symplectic variety X is called primitive symplectic, if moreover

  1. (1)

    H1(X,𝒪X)=0, and

  2. (2)

    H0(Xreg,ΩXreg2)=kσ.

A smooth projective irreducible symplectic variety, also known as projective hyper-Kähler variety (see [14] and [35]), is clearly a primitive symplectic variety ((cf. [76])).

Remark 2.2.

The singularities of a primitive symplectic variety is always rational, i.e., for any resolution of singularities g:YX, we have Rg𝒪Y=𝒪X; see [15, Proposition 1.3] or [11, Corollary 3.5]. Moreover, a primitive symplectic variety X has only terminal singularities if and only if codimXsing4 by Namikawa [63, Corollary 1].

Example 2.3.

Moduli spaces of sheaves on K3 surfaces provide important examples of symplectic varieties; see [71] for more details. Let (S,H) be a smooth polarized K3 surface. For a primitive Mukai vector v0K0(S) with v02=k0 (which is always even), we can consider the moduli space of H-semistable sheaves MH(S,v) on S with Mukai vector v=mv0 for some integer m>0. It is an irreducible projective normal variety if it is non-empty, which admits a symplectic form on the regular locus. Assume further that H is v-generic.

  1. (1)

    If k0,m=1, then MH(S,v) is a smooth irreducible symplectic variety of dimension k+2.

  2. (2)

    If k=0,m2, then MH(S,v)=S(n), the n-th symmetric product of a K3 surface S. It is a primitive symplectic variety since it has a symplectic resolution S[n]S(n) by the Hilbert scheme of n points. However, it admits a quasi-étale covering S×nS(n) such that dimH0(S×n,ΩS×n2)=n, thus is not irreducible when n2 in the sense of [28, Definition 8.16].

  3. (3)

    If k2,m2, then it is a -factorial (see [41] and [70]) primitive symplectic variety. If k=m=2, then it is at worst 2-factorial ([70, Theorem 1.1]) and it admits a symplectic resolution, which is of OG10 deformation type. The rest cases are locally factorial ([41, Theorem A]) with terminal singularities, since their singular loci have codimension 4 (cf. [41, Proposition 6.1]).

Example 2.4.

Recently, a new series of examples of -factorial terminal primitive symplectic varieties with b2(X)24 is constructed in [53], by compactifying the relative Jacobian fibration of universal families of cubic fivefolds containing a fixed cubic fourfold.

Example 2.5.

Unlike in the smooth case, based on [26], Fu–Menet [25, Section 5] constructed examples of primitive symplectic varieties with very small second Betti numbers (e.g. b25) by taking the symplectic quotients of smooth irreducible symplectic varieties; see also [42, Example 6.1-6.3] for a recent summary.

The automorphism groups of primitive symplectic varieties behave similarly as those of smooth ones:

Lemma 2.6.

Let X be a primitive symplectic variety over k. Then

  1. (1)

    H0(X,TX)=0.

  2. (2)

    For any ample line bundle , the automorphism group scheme Aut¯(X,) is finite and étale over k.

  3. (3)

    If X is terminal, then the birational automorphism group functor Bir¯(X) (see [29] for the precise definition) is represented by a locally of finite type group scheme, and dimBir¯(X)=0. Moreover, Bir(XL)=Bir¯(X)(L) is countable as a set for any field kL.

Proof.

The first statement follows directly from [11, Lemma 4.6].

For the second statement, choose m such that m is very ample and observe that the embedding φ|m|:XN gives rise to a closed immersion of group schemes

Aut¯(X,m)PGLN.

Therefore, Aut¯(X,)Aut¯(X,m) is a smooth linear algebraic group over k. Since dimAut¯(X,)=dimH0(X,TX)=0, and char(k)=0, the group scheme Aut¯(X,) must be finite and étale over k.

In (3), the representability of Bir¯(X) is given by [29, Theorem (3.3)]. Moreover, we can see dimBir¯(X)=H1(X,𝒪X)=0 by Corollary (4.8) in loc.cit.. The group scheme Bir(X) is an open subscheme of the Hilbert scheme Hilb(X×X), which has countably many connected components. Then we can see Bir(XL)=π0(Bir¯(X)) is a countable set. ∎

2.2. Locally trivial families of primitive symplectic varieties

Definition 2.7.

Let B be a complex variety, and 𝒳 a complex algebraic space. A proper flat holomorphic morphism π:𝒳B is a family of primitive symplectic varieties over if all geometric fibers are primitive symplectic varieties.
Similarly, over an algebraically closed field k of characteristic 0, we define a family of primitive symplectic varieties as a proper flat morphism from a k-algebraic space to a k-variety with all geometric fibers primitive symplectic varieties over k.

Definition 2.8.

A family of primitive symplectic varieties π:𝒳B over k is called locally trivial if for any closed point x𝒳, there is an isomorphism of 𝒪B-algebras

𝒪𝒳,xsh𝒪B,π(x)shk𝒪𝒳π(x),xsh, (2.1)

where ()sh denotes the strictly Henselization at the given point.

Recall that a holomorphic map between complex analytic spaces π:𝒳B is called locally trivial (see [23]) if for any point tB and any point p𝒳t, there exists an analytic open neighborhood p𝔘𝒳 such that t=π(p)Vπ(𝔘)B is an analytic open neighborhood and there is a biholomorphism 𝔘V×(𝔘𝒳t) commuting with the projections to V.

It is useful to observe that the local triviality of a family can be checked both formal locally or in the analytic category when k=.

Lemma 2.9.

Let π:𝒳B be a family of primitive symplectic varieties over . The following conditions are equivalent:

  1. (1)

    The family π is locally trivial in the sense of Definition 2.8.

  2. (2)

    The analytification πan:𝒳anBan is locally trivial as a map between complex analytic spaces.

  3. (3)

    for any x𝒳an, there is an isomorphism of 𝒪B-algebras

    𝒪^𝒳an,x𝒪^Ban,π(x)𝒪^𝒳π(x)an,x, (2.2)

    where ()^ denotes the formal completion at the given point.

Proof.

The implication (2)(3) follows directly by taking formal completion. The implication (3)(2) follows from [6, Corollary (1.6)]. Moreover, Artin’s approximation theorem ([7, Corollary 2.6]) implies that (1) and (3) are equivalent. ∎

Remark 2.10.

In [10], a locally trivial algebraic family means locally trivial in the Zariski topology, which is more restrictive than our definition here. We thank Prof. Christian Lehn for clarifying this to us.

The following fact allows us to relate the study of a locally trivial family of primitive symplectic varieties to that of a smooth family of symplectic varieties.

Proposition 2.11.

Let B be a complex variety, and π:𝒳B a locally trivial family of primitive symplectic varieties. Then there exists a simultaneous resolution of singularities

𝒳~𝒳Bgπ

such that g restricts to an isomorphism on g1(𝒳reg) to 𝒳reg.

Proof.

This is essentially addressed in [11, Lemma 4.9]. Note that in loc. cit., only gan is constructed. However, the resolution gan arises from an algorithmic resolution of singularities through successive blow-ups, guided by the Bierstone–Milman invariant invb:𝒳bΓ at each step. Consequently, the successive blow-up loci can be globally glued as algebraic subspaces of 𝒳 since invb(x) is determined by the complete local ring 𝒪^𝒳b,x. Thus, we obtain the simultaneous resolution 𝒳~B in the category of algebraic spaces over B. ∎

It is worth noting that a locally trivial family is locally acyclic in the étale topology.

Lemma 2.12.

If π is locally trivial (in the sense of Definition 2.8), then the higher direct image Riπe´t/n¯ is locally constant in the étale topology of B for any integer i and positive integer n.

Proof.

Since Riπe´t/n¯ are constructible by the proper base change theorem, the statement is equivalent to say that the specialization map

sps¯,t¯:(Riπe´t/n¯)s¯(Riπe´t/n¯)t¯

is an isomorphism for any specialization t¯s¯ in B. According to [78, Tag 0GJW], it is sufficient to show π is locally acyclic, i.e., the pull-back

RΓ(Spec(𝒪𝒳,x¯sh),/n¯)RΓ(Spec(𝒪𝒳,x¯sh)×𝒪B,π(x¯)sht¯,/n¯) (2.3)

is an isomorphism for any geometric point x¯ of 𝒳, and geometric point t¯ of 𝒪B,f(x¯)sh. Since f is locally trivial, there is an isomorphism of 𝒪B-algebras

𝒪𝒳,x¯sh𝒪𝒳π(x¯),x¯shk𝒪B,π(x¯)sh,

where ()sh is the strictly Henselization. Then we have

RΓ(Spec(𝒪𝒳,x¯sh),/n¯) RΓ(Spec(𝒪𝒳π(x¯),x¯sh𝒪B,π(x¯)sh),/n¯) (2.4)
RΓ(Spec(𝒪𝒳π(x¯),x¯sh),/n¯),

where the second isomorphism is given by the Künneth formula. For any geometric point t¯ of Spec(𝒪B,f(x¯)sh), the fiber product

Spec(𝒪𝒳,x¯sh)×𝒪B,f(x¯)sht¯Spec(𝒪𝒳f(x¯),x¯sh)×Spec()t¯.

is the base extension of Spec(𝒪𝒳f(x¯),x¯sh) along k(t¯)/k. Hence

RΓ(Spec(𝒪𝒳f(x¯),x¯sh),/n¯)RΓ(Spec(𝒪𝒳,x¯sh)×𝒪B,f(x¯)sht¯,/n¯)) (2.5)

by the geometric invariance (smooth base change) of étale cohomology (see [78, Tag 0F0B]). By the construction, the composition of (2.4) and (2.5) is the pull-back (2.3). This implies f is locally acyclic in the étale topology. ∎

2.3. -factoriality in locally trivial families

In analyzing the birational geometry of primitive symplectic varieties, it is common to assume they are -factorial. However, some basic geometric operations can disrupt -factoriality. This section outlines essential facts for subsequent discussions. As before, k is denoted for an algebraically closed field of characteristic 0.

First, we record a technical lemma, which allows us to compare the geometric generic fiber with a very general fiber in a given family.

Lemma 2.13.

Let B be an integral variety over k, and 𝒳B be a flat proper algebraic space. Let Ω be a universal domain containing k, i.e., an algebraically closed field with infinite transcendental degree over its prime field. Let η be the generic point of B. There exist countably many non-empty open subschemes {UiB}iI such that for any Ω-point

biIUi(Ω)B(Ω)

we have an (abstract) isomorphism 𝒳ηΩ¯𝒳b of schemes, (which induces an isomorphism ηΩ¯Ω), where ηΩ¯ is the geometric generic point of BΩ. In particular, there is an isomorphism

Pic(𝒳ηΩ¯)Pic(𝒳b).
Proof.

Set BΩ=B×kΩ. By the spreading out argument for morphisms of finite type, between algebraic spaces of finite type over Ω, which follows from [78, 06G4, 07SK, 0CPC, 0CPE], there exist a finitely generated subfield FΩ and a variety T of finite type over F, satisfying the following.

  1. (1)

    We have a Ω-isomorphism T×FΩBΩ.

  2. (2)

    There exists a proper algebraic space 𝒳 over T such that 𝒳×FΩ𝒳Ω compatible with the isomorphism in (1).

With the same argument as in the proof of [83, Lemma 2.1], we can find the required isomorphism 𝒳η¯Ω𝒳b for some bB(Ω) inside the intersection of a countable set of non-empty open subschemes {UiB}iI. ∎

Definition 2.14.

Let 𝒳B be a locally trivial family of primitive symplectic varieties over an integral variety B over k. We say 𝒳 is a locally trivial family of -factorial primitive symplectic varieties when 𝒳b is -factorial primitive symplectic variety for any closed point bB.

In general, the notion of -factorial is not stable under étale base change. Fortunately, it satisfies geometric invariance under mild singularity assumptions. The following statement was taught to the third author by Shou Yoshikawa.

Lemma 2.15.

Let F/k be an extension of algebraically closed fields. Let X be a normal projective variety over k. Then XF is a normal projective -factorial klt variety if and only if X is -factorial and klt. The same holds if we replace klt by terminal.

Proof.

Let us only show that if X is -factorial and klt then XF is -factorial. The other assertions are easy and left to the reader. Let Y be a projective log resolution of X. Then, as X is -factorial, we have a sequence of birational maps over k:

Y=Y0f0Y1f1fn1Yn=X,

by the proof of [55, Theorem 22.1]. Here, each dotted arrow represents either a divisorial contraction or a flip (for some klt pair) over k. We claim that all Yi,F are -factorial. In particular, Xn,F=XF is -factorial. The claim can be proved by induction. Since Y0,F is regular, Y0,F is clearly -factorial. Assume that Yi,F is -factorial.

  1. (1)

    If fi is a divisorial contraction, then the base extension fi,F:Yi,FYi+1,F is also a divisorial contraction since it is still of relative Picard number 1 as k and F are algebraically closed. Thus Yi+1,F is also -factorial (see [55, Lemma 19.3] for example).

  2. (2)

    If fi is a flip, i.e., it factors as

    YiYi+1Zfigigi+

    where gi and gi+ are small contractions. After the base extension to F, gi,F and gi,F+ are still of relative Picard number 1 as k is algebraically closed. Moreover, clearly gi,F and gi,F+ are small contractions. Therefore, fi,F is a filp, and Yi+1,F is -factorial (see [55, Lemma 20.3] for example). ∎

Thanks to Lemma 2.15, we can see the notion of locally trivial family of -factorial primitive varieties is well-behaved under a base-change.

Proposition 2.16.

Let π:𝒳B be a locally trivial family of primitive symplectic varieties over k. Let 0B be a regular k-point. Suppose the fiber X𝒳0 is a -factorial terminal primitive symplectic variety.

  1. (1)

    The geometric generic fiber 𝒳η¯ is -factorial and terminal.

  2. (2)

    The family π is a locally trivial family of -factorial primitive symplectic varieties if and only if any geometric fiber 𝒳s is a -factorial primitive symplectic variety. Moreover, in any case, all geometric fibers of π have terminal singularities.

Proof.

For (1), we may assume that B is regular by shrinking B since (1) is about the geometric generic fiber and 0B is assumed to be regular. By Lemma 2.15 and the spreading out argument (see Lemma 2.13 for example), we may assume that k is an algebraic closure of finitely generated field of characteristic 0. By choosing the embedding k and using Lemma 2.15 again, we can reduce the problem to the case where k=. In this case, there exists an open subscheme 0UB such that 𝒳|U is -factorial by [46, (12.1.9)] and the Bertini theorem. Here, note that, since π is locally trivial, on each fiber, the singular locus has codimension 4 by [63, Corollary 1]. By Lemma 2.13, for general closed point bU, we have an isomorphism (as a scheme) 𝒳b𝒳η¯. Therefore, we obtain the desired result.

For (2), it is enough to show the “only if” part. We fix a geometric point s of B. By taking the Zariski closure of the image of s, we can reduce this to (1). It finishes the proof. ∎

2.4. Period map and Local Torelli Theorem

For a complex primitive symplectic variety X, it is known that the torsion-free part of the second cohomology

H2(X,)tfH2(X,)/torsion

carries a pure Hodge structure of weight 2, since X has at worst rational singularities. Moreover, there exists an integral quadratic form called Beauville–Bogomolov(–Fujiki–Namikawa) form

qX:H2(X,)tf

that is compatible with the Hodge structure on H2(X,)tf (see [64, Theorem 8] or [11, Subsection 5.1] for example). This quadratic form coincides with the classical Beauville–Bogomolov form when X is an irreducible symplectic manifold (up to scaling) and is also referred to as the Beauville–Bogomolov form on X.

Analogous to irreducible symplectic manifolds, when X varies in a locally trivial family, the Hodge structure and the Beauville–Bogomolov form on H2(X,)tf forms a polarized variation of Hodge structure.

Proposition 2.17.

Let π:𝒳B be a locally trivial family of primitive symplectic varieties over .

  1. (1)

    The higher direct images Riπan are -local systems. Moreover, R2πan is equipped with a -variation of Hodge structure.

  2. (2)

    There exists a morphism of -variations of Hodge structure.

    q:Sym2R2πan(1),

    such that q𝒳b on each fiber 𝒳b is the Beauville–Bogomolov form.

Proof.

The statement (1) is due to Namikawa ([65, p.13] (arXiv version)). See also [2, Proposition 5.1]. For other statements, see [11, Corollary 3.5, Lemma 5.7, Lemma 4.9]. ∎

The local Torelli theorem completes the picture:

Proposition 2.18 (Local Torelli Theorem).

Let X be a complex primitive symplectic variety, and π:𝒳Deflt(X) be the Kuranishi family of locally trivial deformations of X (see [11, Subsection 4.4]). Let Λ=H2(X,)tf the lattice with Beauville–Bogomolov form. The period map

Deflt(X)ΩΛ

associated with the variation of Hodge structure R2π is a local isomorphism. Here, ΩΛ is the period domain

ΩΛ:={[σ](Λ)|q(σ)=0,q(σ,σ¯)>0}.
Proof.

See [11, Proposition 5.5]. ∎

3. Cone conjectures for primitive symplectic varieties

For K3 surfaces, the study of the action of the automorphism group on the nef cone plays an important role for showing finiteness results; see [79], [18]. In this section, we recall its higher-dimensional generalizations, namely the so-called Kawamata–Morrison cone conjectures, which have been established for primitive symplectic varieties (see [57], [56], [1] for the smooth case and [50] for the generalization to the singular setting).

3.1. Néron–Severi lattices and cones

Let B be a variety over k and π:𝒳B a family of primitive symplectic varieties (in the sense of Definition 2.7).

Suppose k=, the exponential sequence induces an exact sequence of analytic sheaves

0=R1π𝒪𝒳Pic¯𝒳/BR2πR2π𝒪𝒳.

Since fibers 𝒳b have at worst rational singularities, Du Bois–Jarraud’s base-change theorem [48, Theorem 2.62, Complement 2.62.5] implies that Riπ𝒪𝒳 is locally free for all integers i0. Since H1(𝒳b,𝒪𝒳b)=0 for any bB, the Picard scheme Pic¯𝒳/B is of dimension zero. For this reason, the identity component Pic¯𝒳/B0 is trivial and on the geometric fiber 𝒳b¯,

Pic¯𝒳/B(b¯)Pic(𝒳b¯)NS(𝒳b¯)

are Néron–Severi groups. Moreover, it is easy to see the Lefschetz-(1,1) theorem holds by Proposition 2.17 (1).

Definition 3.1.

Let X be a primitive symplectic variety over a subfield k. The Néron–Severi lattice is the (torsion-free) Néron–Severi group NS(Xk)tf=Pic(Xk)tf together with restriction of the Beauville–Bogomolov form along

NS(Xk)tf=NS(X)tfH2(X,)tf.

For simplicity, we denote NS(Xk) for the Néron–Severi lattice NS(Xk)tf in the following.

Remark 3.2.

By spreading out argument and the proof of [16, Corollary 4.2.1], there is a unique Beauville–Bogomolov form on NS(Xk)tf for any field k in characteristic zero, which is independent of the field embedding k.

In the following, π:𝒳B is assumed to be projective, and each fiber 𝒳b for bB is a primitive symplectic variety with -factorial terminal singularities. In this case, the Picard scheme Pic¯𝒳/S admits a global section over B given by the relative ample line bundle and thus rkPic¯𝒳/B(B)1.

Consider the following relative Néron–Severi space on 𝒳 (modulo π-numerical equivalence):

N1(𝒳/B)=Pic¯𝒳/B(B)/π

where π is the numerical equivalence relation over B, i.e., D1πD2 if and only if D1C=D2C for any curve in 𝒳 such that π(C) is a point.

Definition 3.3.

Let Eff(X/B)N1(𝒳/B) be the cone generated by effective -Cartier divisors over B.

  1. (1)

    Nefe(𝒳/B)=Nef(𝒳/B)Eff(𝒳/B) is the effective nef cone;

  2. (2)

    Mov¯e(𝒳/B)=Mov¯(𝒳/B)Eff(𝒳/B) is the effective movable cone.

Moreover, we also consider the following rational cones

  1. (3)

    Nef+(𝒳/B)Conv(Nef(𝒳/B)N1(𝒳/B)).

  2. (4)

    Mov+(𝒳/B)Conv(Mov¯(𝒳/B)N1(𝒳/B))

where Conv() stands for the convex hull.

For simplicity of notations, we denote

Nefe(X)(resp. Mov¯e(X))

for the corresponding effective nef (resp. movable) cone for simplicity when B=Spec(F) for a a field F.

Conjecture 3.4 (Kawamata–Morrison Cone Conjecture).

Let π:𝒳B be a projective family of primitive symplectic varieties with -factorial terminal singularities.

  1. (1)

    The effective nef cone Nefe(𝒳/B) admits a rational polyhedral fundamental domain under the action of the relative automorphism group Autπ(𝒳), which consists of automorphisms of 𝒳 over π.

  2. (2)

    The effective movable cone Mov¯e(𝒳/B) admits a rational polyhedral fundamental domain under the action of the relative pseudo-automorphism group PsAutπ(𝒳), which consists of birational automorphisms of 𝒳 over B that are isomorphisms in codimension one.

3.2. Kawamata–Morrison cone conjectures over a field

In this subsection, we consider the cone conjecture when X𝒳B=Spec(F) over a field. Here F is an arbitrary field in characteristic zero, which is not necessarily algebraically closed. The motivation is to obtain some finiteness results on the generic fibers of families of primitive symplectic varieties.

Fix an algebraic closure F¯ for F. If XF¯ has -factorial terminal singularities, the birational ample cone is defined as the union

BA(X)fXfAmp(Y)N1(X),

where

X={f:XY|YF¯ is a -factorial terminal primitive symplectic variety over F¯ and f is birational}.

Notice that being ample (resp.  movable) is stable under field extensions, thus we have BA(X)=BA(XF¯)N1(X) (resp.  Mov(X)=Mov(XF¯)N1(X)) by the Galois descent as in [81, Proposition 4.2.2]. Then it follows from [50, Proposition 5.8] that the closure of BA(X) is equal to the movable cone Mov¯(X).

Theorem 3.5.

Let X be a projective primitive symplectic variety over F with b2(X)5 such that XF¯ is -factorial and terminal. Then the cone Nef+(X) (resp. Mov+(X)) admits a fundamental domain Π under the action of Aut(X) (resp. Bir(X)), which is a rational polyhedral subcone.

Proof.

Let us only give a sketch of the proof and refer to Faucher [22] for full details111After the first version of the paper was made public, the authors were informed that full details were being carried out in the PhD thesis of Aurélien Faucher.. When F=, this is Theorem 1.2 of [50]. The Lefschetz principle (here we use Lemma 2.15) implies that it holds for any algebraically closed field of characteristic zero.

If F is not algebraically closed, we note that the method of [81, Theorem 4.2.7 (and Theorem 4.1.4)] also applies to singular primitive symplectic varieties. Note that we also need the basic facts about birational cone conjecture over F¯ in [50], and the fact that a prime exceptional divisor on XF¯ is rigid (see [43, Theorem 1.1], cf. [57, Theorem 5.8]). Thus, Theorem 3.5 holds over an arbitrary base field F of characteristic zero. ∎

Suppose F=. Recall that

MonHdglt(X)O(H2(X,),qX)

is the subgroup consisting of all parallel transport operators from a locally trivial family that contains X, which also preserves Hodge structures.

Definition 3.6.

Let X be a complex primitive symplectic variety with -factorial terminal singularities. Then a Cartier divisor D is called a wall divisor or a monodromy birationally minimal (MBM) class if q(D)<0 and

Φ(D)BA(X)=,

for any ΦMonHdglt(X). We denote the set of wall divisors on X by 𝒲(X).

Example 3.7 (MBM classes on K3[n]-type manifolds).

If X is a K3 surface, the MBM classes in N1(X) are the classes of (2)-curves. By the work of Hassett–Tschinkel [30] (see also [3, Theorem 4.1]), if (X,L) is a smooth polarized irreducible symplectic variety of K3[2]-type, then the norm and divisibility of MBM classes D in N1(X) satisfy one of the following conditions:

  1. (1)

    q(D)=10, and div(D)=2,

  2. (2)

    q(D)=2, and div(D)=1, or

  3. (3)

    q(D)=2, and div(D)=2.

More generally, for K3[n]-type manifolds, information on the MBM classes can be obtained from the minimal model program of K3[n]-type manifolds, see [61], [13], [12].

Amerik and Verbitsky [1] observed that the Beauville–Bogomolov squares of all primitive wall divisors on a smooth irreducible symplectic variety over are bounded from below. This fact is generalized to primitive symplectic varieties with -factorial terminal singularities in [50, Proposition 7.7].

Proposition 3.8.

Let X be a primitive symplectic variety over , with -factorial terminal singularities and b2(X)5. There exists an integer N>0 such that

qY(D)N,

for any -factorial terminal primitive symplectic variety Y which is locally trivial deformation equivalent to X, and any primitive wall divisor D on Y.

From this fact and Theorem 3.5, we can deduce the finiteness of birational models of X over a general field k of characteristic 0 (not necessarily algebraically closed).

Corollary 3.9.

If X is a projective -factorial primitive symplectic variety over F with terminal singularities, and b2(X)5, then up to F-isomorphism, there are only finitely many -factorial terminal F-birational models of X.

Proof.

Let

Σ={f(E)| ENS(Y) is primitive and extremal in the dual cone Nef(Y), and :fYX¯F such that Y is Q-factorial terminal primitive symplectic variety over ¯F }

Let ΠNef+(X) be the fundamental domain of the Aut(X)-action, which is given by Theorem 3.5. By the argument of [56, Proposition 2.2.], we can see

{DΣ|DΠ𝒞}

is a countable set (here, 𝒞N1(X) is a connected component of the positive cone). We shall show that

𝒲{DΣ|DΠ𝒞}

is a finite set. When F¯=, this follows from Proposition 3.8 and [56, Proposition 3.4]. The general case follows from the Lefschetz principle. Then we can conclude it by the proof of [81, Theorem 4.2.7]. ∎

Remark 3.10.

It is well-known that the nef cone conjecture of X will imply that there are only finitely many birational contractions of X up to F-isomorphism. See [27, Proposition 5.3].

Proposition 3.11.

Let F/F be a finite field extension, and X a projective primitive symplectic variety over F with -factorial terminal singularities such that b2(X)5. Then the set

TwF/F(X)={Y|Y is a projective primitive symplectic variety over F such that YFXF}/F-isom

is a finite set.

Proof.

This follows from the same argument as in [81, Theorem 4.3.6] by using Lemma 2.6, Theorem 3.5, and [11, Theorem 6.16]. ∎

Proof.

We adapt the proof of [81, Theorem 4.3.6] to the setting of projective primitive symplectic varieties with -factorial terminal singularities. The argument proceeds in three steps.

Step 1: A uniform bound on polarization degrees. As in [81, Theorem 4.3.6], we may first replace F by a finite Galois extension of F containing it; this does not change the set of twists TwF/F(X). Now let Y be a projective primitive symplectic variety over F with YFXF. Then YF¯XF¯, and we obtain a Gal(F¯/F)‑equivariant isometry of Néron–Severi lattices

Φ:NS(YF¯)NS(XF¯)

preserving the Beauville–Bogomolov form. The Galois action on NS(XF¯) factors through a finite quotient. Moreover, the set of possible Gal(F¯/F)‑module structures on a lattice of fixed rank and discriminant is finite.

As b2(X)5, using the boundedness of MBM classes [1, Theorem 5.3] together with the global Torelli theorem for primitive symplectic varieties [11, Theorem 6.16], we can follow the analogue of [81, Lemma 4.3.3] in our setting. Consequently, there exists a positive integer d, depending only on the deformation type of X and the lattice NS(XF¯), such that every such Y admits a polarization LY with (LY,LY)=d.

Step 2: Finiteness of polarizations of fixed square modulo automorphisms. By the cone conjecture for primitive symplectic varieties (Theorem 3.5), the action of Aut(XF¯) on Nef+(XF¯) admits a rational polyhedral fundamental domain. Adapting [81, Lemma 3.1.5] to the Beauville–Bogomolov form, we conclude that for the fixed integer d above, the set of polarizations of square d on XF¯ modulo Aut(XF¯) is finite. Choose representatives M1,,MmNS(XF¯) for these classes.

Step 3: Finiteness of Galois twists. For each i=1,,m, define

Ti={(Y,L)|Y projective primitive symplectic over F,L a polarization on Y with (L,L)=d,(Y,L)F(XF,Mi)}/F-isomorphism.

The construction in Step 1 gives each YTwF/F(X) a polarization LY of square d. Sending Y to (Y,LY) defines an injection

TwF/F(X)i=1mTi.

It remains to show that each Ti is finite. Assume Ti and choose a basepoint (Y0,L0)Ti. Then Ti is in bijection with the Galois cohomology set

H1(Gal(F/F),AutF(Y0,L0)),

where AutF(Y0,L0) is the automorphism group of the polarized variety (Y0,L0) over F. By Lemma 2.6, AutF(Y0,L0) is a finite group. Hence the cohomology set is finite.

Since TwF/F(X) embeds into a finite disjoint union of finite sets, it is itself finite. This completes the proof. ∎

Remark. The condition b2(X)5 is used to apply the cone conjecture (Theorem 3.5) and the boundedness of MBM classes, which are known for primitive symplectic varieties with this assumption.

3.3. Consequences of cone conjectures: finiteness results

In this part, we assume that k=k¯ in characteristic zero as before. As in the case of K3 surfaces [79], cone conjectures imply some finiteness results. In higher-dimensions and in the relative setting, we have the following statement due to [52, Theorem 1.4] and [34, Proposition 4.3, Corollary 4.4].

Proposition 3.12.

Let π:𝒳B be a projective morphism with connected K-trivial fibers, such that 𝒳 and B are normal and -factorial klt variety over k. Assume the good minimal model exists for all klt pairs of the geometric generic fiber of π, and Mov+(𝒳η)Eff(𝒳η). If the action

PsAut(𝒳η)Mov+(𝒳η)

admits a rational polyhedral fundamental domain, and then there are only finitely many small -factorial modifications 𝒳𝒳 over B, up to isomorphism over B.

Proof.

The statement in this proposition is stable under any algebraically closed field extension kL. Thus we may assume that the algebraically closed field k is uncountable for simplicity. Under the assumptions, good minimal model exists for any klt pairs on a very general fiber. Moreover, there is a polyhedral subcone ΠEff(𝒳η) such that

Mov(𝒳η)PsAut(𝒳η)Π (3.1)

by Looijenga’s results (see [51, Proposition 3.3] for example). Then we can see there are only finitely many small -factorial modifications 𝒳𝒳 over B by applying [34, Proposition 4.3]. ∎

The following is a generalization of Corollary 3.9 in the relative case.

Corollary 3.13.

Let B be a normal integral -factorial variety over k. Let 𝒳B be a projective locally trivial family of -factorial primitive symplectic varieties with terminal singularities and second Betti number b2. Suppose

  1. (1)

    b25,

  2. (2)

    the total space 𝒳 is -factorial terminal, and

  3. (3)

    there on the geometric generic fiber 𝒳η¯, all nef divisors are semi-ample.

Then 𝒳 has finitely many small -factorial modifications over B.

Proof.

Note that the generic fiber 𝒳η is a primitive symplectic variety with -factorial terminal singularities under the condition (2) (see also Proposition 2.16). Thus the pseudo-automorphism group PsAut(𝒳η)=Bir(𝒳η). Theorem 3.5 implies that the action

PsAut(𝒳η)Mov¯+(𝒳η)

admits a rational polyhedral fundamental domain when b2(𝒳η¯)5.

The condition (3) ensures that the good minimal model exists for the klt pairs (𝒳η¯,Δ) of the geometric generic fiber 𝒳η¯. Note that, Boucksom–Zariski decomposition for effective -Cartier divisors holds by [43, Theorem 1.1]. Then, under the assumption, we also have Mov+(𝒳η)Eff(𝒳η) by the proof of [34, Proposition 5.5 (b1)].

Thus Proposition 3.12 imply that there are only finitely many small -factorial modifications of 𝒳 over B. ∎

Finally, we make a remark that the condition (2) in Corollary 3.13 is redundant when B is regular.

Lemma 3.14.

Let k be an algebraically closed field of characteristic 0. Let B be a smooth variety over k, and 𝒳B a locally trivial family of -factorial terminal primitive symplectic varieties. Then the total space 𝒳 is also -factorial and terminal.

Proof.

We may assume that B is an affine scheme. Let bB a closed point. Then by the proof of [46, (12.1.9)] and the Bertini theorem, 𝒳 is -factorial near 𝒳b. Since b is any, 𝒳 is -factorial. The terminality follows from the inversion of adjunction (see [62, Chapter VI, Theorem 5.2] for example). ∎

4. Global moduli theory of primitive symplectic varieties

In this section, we will construct the moduli stack 𝐌2n,d of locally trivial families of polarized primitive symplectic varieties of degree d over an algebraically closed field k of characteristic 0. It turns out 𝐌2n,d is a Deligne–Mumford stack that is separated and of finite type over k (see Theorem 4.6). For the separatedness of 𝐌2n,d, the key point is to establish the Matsusaka–Mumford theorem for singular symplectic varieties (Proposition 4.2 and Corollary 4.3), which is originally stated for smooth families.

As an application, we will establish the following finiteness result by the geometric hyperbolicity of 𝐌2n,d, using a method similar to that in [24].

Theorem 4.1.

Let (B,0) be a pointed smooth variety over k with the generic point η. Let X be a projective primitive symplectic variety over k. Let d be a positive integer. Then the following set is finite:

ShafB,X,d{(𝒳η,L)|𝒳B is a locally trivial family of primitive symplectic varieties such that 𝒳0XLPic𝒳η/η(η) is a polarization of degree d}/η.

4.1. Matsusaka–Mumford theorem for locally trivial families

In this subsection, we prove a Matsusaka–Mumford type theorem for locally trivial families of (possibly singular) primitive symplectic varieties.

Proposition 4.2.

Let B be a variety over k, and 𝒳~,𝒴~ locally trivial families of primitive symplectic varieties over B. Fix a regular codimension-1 point of B, let R be its local ring with residue field s and fraction field η, and set 𝒳:=𝒳~R, 𝒴:=𝒴~R. For any birational map f:𝒳η𝒴η between generic fibers, there exist closed algebraic subspaces V𝒳, W𝒴 with Vs𝒳s, Ws𝒴s, such that f extends to an isomorphism:

f~:𝒳V𝒴W.
Proof.

By Proposition 2.11, we can take simultaneous resolutions

𝒳𝒳and𝒴𝒴.

We note that we have a birational map

f:𝒳η𝒴η

induced by f, and 𝒴s is non-ruled by the assumption. Then by [24, Theorem A.2], there exist closed algebraic subspaces V𝒳 and W𝒴 with Vs𝒳s and Ws𝒴s such that f extends to

f~:𝒳V𝒴W.

Also, by the construction of simultaneous resolutions, there exist closed subspaces Z𝒳, Z𝒳, Z𝒴, Z𝒴 on 𝒳, 𝒳, 𝒴, 𝒴 respectively such that

𝒳Z𝒳𝒳Z𝒳and𝒴Z𝒴𝒴Z𝒴.

Let V𝒳 and W𝒴 be the image of V and W in 𝒳 and 𝒴 respectively. Then by putting

V:=V𝒳Z𝒳andW:=W𝒴Z𝒴,

we obtain the assertion. ∎

As an application, we get the following result.

Corollary 4.3 (Polarized Matsusaka–Mumford Theorem).

Let 𝒳,𝒴 be as in Proposition 4.2, and suppose f:𝒳η𝒴η is an isomorphism. If there exist ample line bundles on 𝒳 and on 𝒴 over R with fη=η, then f extends uniquely to a global isomorphism:

f~:𝒳𝒴.
Proof.

By Proposition 4.2, f extends to an isomorphism outside closed subspaces V𝒳 and W𝒴. The polarization compatibility fη=η forces V=W= via the ampleness propagation in [47, Proposition 3.1.2]. Thus f~, as well as its inverse, is everywhere defined. ∎

Proposition 4.4.

Let B be a variety over k, 𝒳~ a locally trivial family of primitive symplectic varieties over B, and R the localization of B at a regular codimension-1 point with residue field s and fraction field η. Set 𝒳:=𝒳~R. For any finite subgroup GBir(𝒳η):

  1. (1)

    There exists a closed algebraic subspace V𝒳 with Vs𝒳s, and a homomorphism

    ψ:GAut(𝒳V)

    such that ψ(f)|(𝒳V)η=f for all fG.

  2. (2)

    The composition

    ψ¯:G𝜓Aut(𝒳V)Aut((𝒳V)s)

    is injective.

Proof.

Apply Proposition 4.2 to each fG. The simultaneous resolution of singularities (as in [24, Lemma A.3]) ensures that the exceptional loci Vf𝒳 can be uniformly bounded. Taking V=fGVf, the G-equivariance of resolutions guarantees the homomorphism ψ. Injectivity of ψ¯ follows from the faithfulness of specialization when Vs𝒳s. ∎

4.2. Moduli stack of polarized primitive symplectic varieties

Let Sch be the site of schemes of finite type over k with étale topology. Consider the following fibered category in groupoids

𝐌2n,d:Schk Grpoids
B {(𝒳𝜋B,λ)|π is a locally trivial family of primitive symplectic varieties of dimension 2n and λ is a polarization on 𝒳 with (λ)2n=d.},

where isomorphisms in the groupoids are the natural ones for pairs, and a polarization on 𝒳 is an element λPic𝒳/B(B) whose restriction on any geometric fiber is an ample line bundle.

Remark 4.5.

By the discussion in Section 3.1, over , an (analytic) global section of the Picard scheme is equivalent to a family of integral Hodge (1,1)-classes of π .

Theorem 4.6.

The moduli stack 𝐌2n,d of locally trivial families of polarized primitive symplectic varieties of degree d is a Deligne–Mumford stack, which is smooth, separated, and of finite type over k.

Proof.

Since all primitive symplectic varieties have rational singularities, Matsusaka’s big theorem can be applied (see [58, Theorem 2.4]). Thus the moduli stack 𝐌P of locally trivial families of polarized primitive symplectic varieties with Hilbert polynomial P is a finite type algebraic stack over k (cf. [16, Lemma 3.2.5, Lemma 3.3.6, 3.3.7]). Lemma 2.6 implies that 𝐌P is Deligne–Mumford. Therefore, the stack

𝐌2n,d=PId,n𝐌P

is a Deligne–Mumford stack locally of finite type over k, where

Id,n{P(t)=i02naiti[t]|a2n=d(2n)! and 𝐌P}.

The rest of the required properties can be verified as follows.

  1. (1)

    Since a primitive symplectic variety has only rational singularities, the Kodaria vanishing theorem holds. Thus, as X is K-trivial, the Hilbert polynomial of X with respect to an ample line bundle is equal to P(t)=dim|t|. Then, Kollár–Matsusaka’s inequality ([45, Theorem]) implies that Id,n is a finite set. Therefore, 𝐌2n,d is of finite type over k.

  2. (2)

    The theory of locally trivial deformation given in [11, Theorem 4.7, Lemma 4.13] implies that 𝐌2n,d is smooth over k.

  3. (3)

    Corollary 4.3 implies that the DM stack 𝐌2n,d is separated over k. ∎

4.3. (Weak) polarization and period map

In this part, we will always assume k=.

Fix a connected component 𝐌2n,d of 𝐌2n,d that contains a fixed -base point [X0,λ0], with h=c1(λ0)ΛH2(X0,). Let ΛhhΛ be the sublattice given by the orthogonal complement of h, which is of signature (2,b2(X)3). The period domain ΩΛh of the orthogonal group SO(Λh) is defined as a connected component of

ΩΛh±{[σ](Λh)|q(σ)=0,q(σ,σ¯)>0}.

There is an arithmetic subgroup ΓhO(h) (see [11, Theorem 8.2 (1)] and [57, §8]) and a period map

𝒫h:𝐌2n,d,an[Γh\ΩΛh±], (4.1)

associated with the polarized variation of Hodge structure L¯R2π for the universal polarized family (𝒳𝜋𝐌2n,d,L¯). Borel’s algebraicity theorem, or more generally, the o-minimal GAGA principle ([9, Theorem 1.1]) implies that 𝒫h is algebraic.

Proposition 4.7.

The period map 𝒫h is quasi-finite. More precisely, for any étale atlas U of a connected component 𝐌2n,d, the period map morphism π:U[Γh\ΩΛh±] is quasi-finite to its image.

Proof.

Let U be an étale neighborhood of a point (X,L)𝐌2n,d. The analytic completion of the period map π:U[Γh\ΩΛh±] at the point (X,L) is given by

Deflt(X,L)ΩΛh+ΩΛ

which is a local isomorphism by the local Torelli theorem 2.18 and [11, Lemma 4.13]. This implies that the π:U[Γh\ΩΛh±] is (formally) unramified for any étale atlas U𝐌2n,d. Hence 𝒫h is locally quasi-finite by [78, Lemma 0H2Z]. By Theorem 4.6, the moduli stack 𝐌2n,d is known to be of finite type over . Therefore 𝒫h is quasi-finite. ∎

In general, a locally trivial family is not necessarily a projective morphism. For this reason, we propose the following weaker notion of polarization and show that it always exists.

Definition 4.8.

Let (B,0) be a pointed connected variety. Let π:𝒳B be a locally trivial family of primitive symplectic varieties. Let Λ be the lattice H2(𝒳0,).

  1. (1)

    A weak polarization of π is a global section L¯Γ(B,(R2π)tf) such that

    1. (a)

      L¯b is (1,1)-class for any point bB() with q(L¯b)>0, and

    2. (b)

      L¯b0=c1() for an ample line bundle on 𝒳b0 for a very general point b0 of B.

  2. (2)

    Let hΛ with q(h)>0. A weak polarization on the pointed family 𝒳/B is of type [h] if c1(L¯0)[h]=O(Λ)h.

We shall remark the finiteness of polarization types on a pointed family.

Lemma 4.9.

Let m be a positive integer. There are finitely many O(Λ)-orbit [h] such that the Beauville–Bogomolov square q(h)=m. In particular, for a pointed family of primitive symplectic varieties, a polarization of degree d has finitely many possible equivalent polarization types.

Proof.

Any such h determines an embedding of lattices mΛ, and two h and h lie in the same O(Λ)-orbit if and only if their corresponding embeddings are isomorphic. By [44, Satz (30.2)], there are only finitely many such embeddings up to the action of O(Λ). ∎

We observe that on a locally trivial family, weak polarization always exists even the family is not projective. Moreover, the period map of the weight-two variation of Hodge structure, which is polarized by the weak polarization, has a rational lifting to the moduli stack.

Proposition 4.10.

Suppose π:𝒳B is a locally trivial family of primitive symplectic varieties, with base point 0B(). Let (Λ,q)=(H2(𝒳0,),qX). Then there exist

  1. (1)

    d>0, hΛ with q(h)=d,

  2. (2)

    a rational map ϕπ:B𝐌2n,d to a connected component of 𝐌2n,d, and

  3. (3)

    a weak polarizaton L¯ on π of type [h]

such that the composition of ϕπ with the period map 𝒫h:𝐌2n,d[Γh\ΩΛh±] is a well-defined morphism. In short we have a commutative diagram:

B𝐌2n,d[Γh\ΩΛh±].ϕπ𝒫h (4.2)
Proof.

Let η be a generic point of B. Since 𝒳η is a projective primitive symplectic variety, there exists an open subscheme UB such that 𝒳U is a projective scheme over U. Let L be a πU-ample line bundle on 𝒳U. In other word, the restricted family 𝒳UU admits a polarization L¯. The pair (𝒳UU,L¯) determines a morphism j:U𝐌2n,d. Shrinking U if necessary, we may assume that U is connected. Thus we get a rational map from B to a connected component of 𝐌2n,d

ϕ:B𝐌2n,d

defined over UB. By the construction of 𝒫h, the morphism 𝒫hj:UΓh\ΩΛh± is the period map determined by the primitive part 𝐏2(𝒳U/U).

Recall that R2πan is a local system on Ban by Proposition 2.17. Since UB is a Zariski open subset, the natural morphism

π1(Uan)π1(Ban)

is surjective. Therefore, the section c1(Lan)Γ(Uan,R2πan) extends to a section L¯Γ(B,R2πan). Since L¯b0 is a (1,1)-class for any point b0Uan and UanXan is dense, L¯b are all Hodge (1,1) classes for all points bBan. In particular, L¯ is a weak polarization on 𝒳/B. The type of weak polarization L¯ with respect to the base point b is h=c1(L¯b)Λ.

The orthogonal complement L¯R2πtf is polarized by the restriction of Beauville–Bogomolov form since it satisfies the Hodge–Riemann relations as in the polarized case. Therefore, 𝒫hj extends to the (algebraic) period map

𝒫L¯:B[Γh\ΩΛh±]. (4.3)

associated with L¯. The commutativity of the diagram is clear. ∎

Remark 4.11.

We note that the pointed Shafarevich set (Pointed Shafarevich problem) is countable up to isomorphism. Assume that B=C is a connected smooth curve. Applying Zariski’s main theorem for the period map 𝒫h, we see there is a closed subset ΔdC such that for locally trivial family π in (Pointed Shafarevich problem) that admits a weak polarization of degree d, the rational map ϕπ has definition outside CΔd. As C is a curve, Δd is a finite set, and for any bΔd, the fibers are finite up to birational equivalence. Now, it is not hard to see the countability from Lemma 2.6 and the Matsusaka–Mumford theorem.

4.4. Proof of Theorem 4.1

Let η¯ be a geometric generic point of B. Note that we have a natural map

ShafB,X,dShaf¯B,X,d,(𝒳η,L)(𝒳η¯,Lη¯) (4.4)

where

Shaf¯B,X,d{(𝒳η¯,Lη¯)(𝒳η,L)ShafB,X,d}/η¯.

It is sufficient to show that Shaf¯B,X,d is finite and that the fibers of (4.4) are finite.

Step (1).

In the setting of Theorem 4.1, the set Shaf¯B,X,d is a finite set.

As before, let Λ denote H2(X,)tf. Let 𝒳B be a locally trivial family with 𝒳0X (over k). For any (𝒳η,L)ShafB,X,d with L an ample line bundle, it defines a point x𝐌2n,d(k(η)) for some connected component 𝐌2n,d𝐌2n,d.

We may assume k. By Proposition 4.10, there exist h such that we have a commutative diagram

B𝐌2n,dΓh\ΩΛh±xx~𝒫h

such that x~(η)=𝒫h,F(x), and x~(0) is the Γh-equivalent classes of polarized -Hodge structures [Hprim2(X,)] for some hΛ. Lemma 4.9 implies that, up to O(Λ), there are only finitely many possible choices of h with a fixed qX(h). Therefore, there are finitely many targets Γh\ΩΛh± for x~ as x varies in ShafB,X,d, because qX(h)dimX/2=d/cX for the Fujiki constant cX of X ( cf. [11, Subsection 5.14]). Therefore, we may assume that all x~ have the same target Γh\ΩΛh± for some hΛ.

In this case, we shall note that x~(0) are also all the same. Therefore, by [37, Theorem 6.1, Lemmas 2.4–2.6], the number of isomorphism classes of x~ (where x varies in ShafB,X,d) is finite, which implies that the number of isomorphism classes of 𝒫h(x) is finite. Since 𝒫h is quasi-finite, 𝒫h on the groupoid over η¯ is finite-to-one modulo isomorphisms. That means, the isomorphism classes of x~(η¯) are finitely many, and it finishes the proof.

Step (2).

Finiteness of twists with locally trivial reduction over B.

More precisely, Let (B,0) be a pointed smooth variety with the generic point η. Let 𝒳 be a locally trivial family of primitive symplectic varieties over B, and L be a polarization on 𝒳η. Then the set

Tw:={(𝒴η,M)|𝒴 is a locally trivial family of primitive symplectic varieties over B,M is a polarization on 𝒴η,there exists (𝒴η¯,Mη¯)η¯(𝒳η¯,Lη¯)}/η

is a finite set.

This follows from the same proof as in [24, Proposition 6.3] by using the Matsusaka–Mumford theorem (Proposition 4.4) and the Hermite–Minkowski type theorem (Lemma 5.3). We sketch the argument in the following. Let G:=Aut¯(𝒳η,L) be the automorphism group scheme, which is a finite group scheme by Lemma 2.6. We may take a finite Galois extension η/η such that G(η¯)=G(η). By the finiteness of

H1(Gal(η/η),Aut¯(𝒴η,Mη)), (4.5)

for any (𝒴η,M)Tw, we may replace η by η, i.e. we may assume that G(η¯)=G(η). Then each (𝒴η,M)Tw (more precisely, the isomorphism f:(𝒴η¯,Mη¯)(𝒳η¯,Lη¯)) defines a 1-cocycle

αf:Gal(η¯/η)G(η¯)=G(η),

which is a group homomorphism. For a codimension 1 point bB, let IbGal(η¯/η) be the inertia subgroup, which is defined after fixing the extension of valuation corresponding to b to F¯. By the construction of αf, we have

ψ¯αf(σ)=1

for σIb, where

ψ¯:G(η)Aut((𝒳V)b)

is the specialization morphism defined in Proposition 4.4 with respect to 𝒪B,b. Since ψ¯ is injective by Proposition 4.4, we have Ibkerαf for any b. This shows that αf factors through π1e´t(SpecB,η¯) by Zariski–Nagata’s purity. Since #kerαf#G(η), by Lemma 5.3, there exists a finite Galois extension η/η that is independent of (𝒴η,M) such that αf|Gal(η¯/η) is trivial, i.e. (𝒴η,Mη)(𝒳η,Lη). By the finiteness of (4.5) again, it finishes the proof. ∎

5. Finiteness of the generic fibers

As before, the base (B,0) is a pointed smooth variety over an algebraically closed field k of characteristic zero, with generic point η. Let X be a projective primitive symplectic variety over k. The goal of this section is to prove the following refinement of Theorem 1.1:

Theorem 5.1.

Suppose that X is -factorial terminal. If b2(X)4, the set

{𝒳η|𝒳 is a locally trivial familyof primitive symplectic varieties over B such that 𝒳0X}/η, (5.1)

is finite, where η denotes isomorphism of generic fibers. If b2(X)=4, the same finiteness holds for non-isotrivial families in (5.1).

Here, a locally trivial family 𝒳B is called isotrivial if there exists an étale surjective morphism BB, such that 𝒳BX×B as B-schemes.

5.1. Construction of Uniform Kuga–Satake map

In the proof, we use the so‐called “uniform Kuga–Satake construction,” as treated in [77], [68] and [24] as a variant of Zarhin’s trick for primitive symplectic varieties, to reduce the problem to the finiteness of families of polarized primitive symplectic varieties, which was established in Section 4.4

In this subsection, we work with the base field k=. For any polarized weight-2 Hodge structure V such that V2,0=1 and V is of signature (2,m), one can associate it with a polarized abelian variety (AV,Φa) of dimension 2m+1 with

H1(AV,)Cl(V)

where Cl(V)=Cl+(V)Cl(V) is the Clifford algebra of V with the /2-grading. The polarization

Φa(x,y):=Trace(ι(x)ya)

on H1(AV,) depends only on the lattice V and an element aCl+(V) such that ι(a)=a, where ι is the involution on Cl(V) (cf. [74, §5.4]). Its degree d=d(a,V) can be computed explicitly in terms of a and V. Moreover, there is a natural inclusion of sub-Hodge structures

V(1)End(H1(AV,),H1(AV,)).

The abelian variety AV is called the full Kuga–Sataka variety of V.

Let π:𝒳B be a locally trivial family of primitive symplectic varieties, with a weak polarization L¯. Let

𝐏2(𝒳/B)L¯R2πtf

be the associated variation of Hodge structure of K3 type, where () is the orthogonal complement with respect to the Beauville–Bogomolov form.

Let 𝐀d,g,n be the moduli stack of abelian varieties of dimension g, with polarization of degree d2 and a level-n structure. The (relative) Kuga–Satake construction for 𝐏2(π) induces a map

B𝐀d,g,n (5.2)

after a finite étale extension of B, where g=2b22 and d,n are some positive integers. At each -point b of B, the image is the Kuga–Satake variety ALb. We point out that the polarized Kuga–Satake map (5.2), and hence the degree d, depends on the polarization type h of L¯. The following theorem is the main result of this section, the key point being that the uniform Kuga–Satake map is independent of the family π:𝒳B.

Theorem 5.2 (Uniform Kuga–Satake).

Let X be a primitive symplectic variety. Let (B,0) a pointed connected complex variety. There exist integers d,g,n>0 and a finite étale covering u:B~B such that for any locally trivial family of primitive symplectic varieties π:𝒳B equipped with a weak polarization L¯ and π1(0)X, there is a morphism

KSπ,L¯:B~𝐀d,g,n,

-variation of Hodge structure H¯ on B~ of weight zero that is independent of π, and an embedding of variations of Hodge structure

u𝐏2(𝒳/B)(1)H¯End¯(R1p), (5.3)

where p:𝒜π,L¯B~ is the pulled-back via KSπ,L¯ of the universal abelian scheme over 𝐀d,g,n.

Proof.

Let Λ be the lattice determined by H2(X,)tf with the Beauville–Bogomolov form. Let L¯ be a weak polarization on 𝒳B of type h.

Consider the subgroup of SO(Λ)() defined as

Gh{gSO(Λ)()|gh=h}.

Fix a connected component ΩΛhΩΛh±. The group Gh naturally acts on ΩΛh. By passing to a degree two covering B of B, we may assume the period map 𝒫L¯ in (4.3) lifted to a morphism

B[Gh\ΩΛh].

There is a unimodular even lattice H of signature (2,m) such that for any h with q(h)>0, lattice Λh or Λh(2) admits a primitive embedding into H by [66, Theorem 1.12.4]. The Kuga–Satake construction gives a morphism of Deligne–Mumford stacks

KS:[ΓH\ΩH]𝐀g,d,n,

where ΓH=SO(H)SO+(H) is the special orthogonal group of lattice H (since H is unimodular). There is an integer N and a finite morphism of Deligne–Mumford stacks j:[Γh𝐬𝐩(N)\ΩΛh][ΓH\ΩH], where Γh𝐬𝐩(N) is the arithmetic subgroup of Gh given by a spin level-N structure. The composition of KS and j is denoted by

βh,N=KSj:[Γh𝐬𝐩(N)\ΩΛh]𝐀g,d,n.

By [72, Proposition 3.8(a)], we can see KS and j are finite morphisms. Hence the same holds for βh,N.

Consider the finite étale morphism of complex analytic stacks [Γh𝐬𝐩(N)\ΩΛh][Gh\ΩΛh] whose degree is equal to the index m=[Gh:Γh𝐬𝐩(N)]. By [24, Lemma 7.1], we can see

mCN2b2(X)2,

where C is a constant depending only on X. Taking the following Cartesian diagram

B~πΓh𝐬𝐩(N)\ΩΛh𝐀g,d,nB[Gh\ΩΛh].phβh,N

The morphism ph is finite étale of degree m. The following Lemma 5.3, a topological version of the Hermite–Minkowski theorem, implies that there are only finitely many possible coverings ph when the family π:𝒳B varies. Thus we can take B~B to be the (finite) fiber products of all such finite coverings B~πB, which is equipped with a morphism B~Γh𝐬𝐩(N)\ΩΛh and is independent of the family π as required. Its composition with βh,N gives the required uniform Kuga–Satake map, which is quasi-finite since B~Γh𝐬𝐩\ΩΛh is quasi-finite. ∎

Lemma 5.3.

Let d be a positive integer. Suppose B is a connected variety over . There are at most finitely many finite étale surjective morphisms p:BB with degree d.

Proof.

Such a finite étale morphism of degree d corresponds to a group homomorphism

π1e´t(B)𝔖d

to the symmetric group of degree d. Since the topological fundamental group π1(Ban) is finitely presented by [33] and [54], its profinite completion π1e´t(B) is topologically finitely presented. Therefore, there are only finitely many such group homomorphisms. ∎

Let X be a primitive symplectic variety over and L a line bundle on X with q(L)>0. Suppose that there is a locally trivial family π:𝒳B of primitive symplectic varieties such that π1(0)X for a closed point 0B and c1(L)=L¯0 for a weak polarization L¯ over π:𝒳B. Let B~B be as in Theorem 5.2, and we fix 0~B~() that is a lift of 0B(). Denote

KSπ,L¯(X)𝐀d,g,n() (5.4)

for KSπ,L¯|0~.

Proposition 5.4.

Let X be a primitive symplectic variety over . The following set of uniform Kuga–Satake varieties is finite:

{KSπ,L¯(X)|π:𝒳B is a locally trivial family of primitive symplectic varieties with weak polarization L¯ such that 𝒳0π1(0)X}.
Proof.

The key observation is that for any weak polarization L¯, the associated polarized abelian variety KSπ,L¯(X)𝐀d,g,n is completely determined by the induced polarized integral Hodge structure on H together with a level structure, and the integral Hodge structure is given by the following datum:

  • The transcendental Hodge structure T(X), which is determined by X up to isometry;

  • A primitive lattice embedding ιL:T(X)c1(L)H, where H denotes the universal Kuga–Satake lattice given in Theorem 5.2.

Since the period satisfies

(H)2,0=ιL(T(X)2,0)

in H by (5.3), it is sufficient to see the finiteness of such primitive embeddings ιL. For this, we can use Nikulin’s theorem [66, Theorem 3.6.3], which asserts that for a fixed even integral lattice H and a sublattice T(X) of signature (2,n), there exist only finitely many primitive embeddings T(X)H up to the action of O(H). ∎

5.2. Finiteness of geometric Néron–Severi lattices

We first establish the finiteness of the Néron-Severi lattice of closed fibers on pointed families.

Proposition 5.5.

Let (B,0) be a connected smooth variety over . Let X be a primitive symplectic variety. Let bB be a fixed closed point. Then the set of Néron–Severi lattices at b

NSb{NS(𝒳b)|𝒳Bis a pointed family as in (Pointed Shafarevich problem)}/isometry

is finite.

Proof.

Let π:B~B be the finite étale covering given in Theorem 5.2 and fix a point b~B~ (resp. 0~B~) over b (resp. 0). Then we obtain a morphism

φ:B~𝐀d,g,n

for any 𝒳B(Pointed Shafarevich problem). Thanks to Proposition 5.4, though the map φ depends on 𝒳B, all possible φ(0~) form a finite set. Therefore, we can fix φ(0~). The geometric hyperbolicity of 𝐀g,d,n (see [37]) implies that there are only finitely many possibilities for φ.

Thus for any fixed bB, the associated uniform Kuga–Satake variety of 𝒳b only has only finitely many possibilities. Then the same argument in [24, Theorem 7.4] (using the Lefschetz (1,1) theorem instead of the Tate conjecture) shows that NS(𝒳b) has finitely many possibilities. ∎

As an application, we get the following consequence.

Corollary 5.6.

Let (B,0) be a pointed smooth variety over k with the generic point η. Let X be a primitive symplectic variety over k. Then

NSShaf{NS(𝒳η¯)|𝒳 is a locally trivial familyof primitive symplectic varieties over Bsuch that 𝒳0X}/isometry. (5.5)

is a finite set.

Proof.

Proposition 4.10 and its proof imply that any such pointed locally trivial family 𝒳/B admits polarization on its generic fiber. Therefore, the set (5.1) of generic fibers is a countable set by Theorem 4.1. Therefore, there exists a countable set of locally trivial families

I{fi:𝒳iB}i

such that the set (5.1) is equal to {𝒳i,η|𝒳iI}. By the spreading-out argument, we may assume that the elements in I are defined over a countable extension of . Therefore, we may assume that k=. Lemma 2.13 implies that there is a point b0B() such that for any Y in (5.1), there is a locally trivial family of primitive symplectic varieties f:𝒳B with 𝒳ηY, and NS(𝒳b0)NS(Yη¯). Thus there is a point b0B() such that

NSShaf=NSb0.

Now the statement follows from Proposition 5.5. ∎

5.3. Proof of Theorem 5.1

We split the proof into three parts according to the second Betti number.

(1).  If b2(X)=3, then any locally trivial algebraic deformation of X is trivial, so the geometric fibers of 𝒳B are all isomorphic to X. In this case, we have 𝒳η¯X×kη¯ and ρ(𝒳η¯)=1. Therefore, one can use the same argument as in Step (2) of Proof of Theorem 4.1 to obtain the finiteness.

(2).  If b2(X)=4, note that the statement only concerns non-isotrivial families. We claim that if 𝒳B is not isotrivial, then the very general fiber of 𝒳B has Picard number one. Indeed, if the geometric generic fiber has Picard number 2, then after shrinking B, we may assume that 𝒳B is projective and admits a rank two lattice-polarization in the sense of [53]. Since the deformation space of locally trivial rank two lattice-polarized primitive symplectic varieties is trivial, this forces 𝒳B to be isotrivial (see also [17], [67] for a different approach), contradicting to the hypothesis. Therefore, we proved that for any non-isotrivial family 𝒳B, its geometric generic fiber 𝒳η¯ has Picard number one. Then, by Corollary 5.6, the minimal polarization degree of 𝒳η is bounded. We obtain the desired result by Theorem 4.1.

(3). Suppose that b2(X)5. Given an element 𝒳ηShafB,X, let ρ=ρ(𝒳η¯) be the geometric Picard number of 𝒳η and m=b2(𝒳η) be its second Betti number. For simplicity, we assume that Pic(𝒳η¯) is torsion-free. Otherwise, we can replace it by the torsion-free part Pic(𝒳η¯)tf. Note that the image of the representation

r:Gal(η¯/η)GL(Pic(𝒳η¯))

is finite and its order is bounded by 3ρ23m2, since we have the following short exact sequence (by considering coefficient-wise modulo 3 map for integral matrices):

01+3Matρ×ρ()GL(Pic(Xη¯))GLρ(/3)0,

and the subgroup 1+3Matρ×ρ() is torsion-free. Note that the first Chern class map induces an Gal(k(η¯)/k(η))-equivariant injection

Pic(𝒳η¯)He´t2(Xη¯,^) primeHe´t2(𝒳η¯,).

We claim that the higher direct image R2πe´t/n is locally constant for any integer n1. This property is stable under algebraically closed extensions; thus, it is sufficient to assume k=. Proposition 2.17 (2) implies that R2πan/n is finite locally constant for any integer n. Therefore, by [82, Exposé XI, Théorème 4.4.], the étale sheaf R2πe´t/n is also finite locally constant since B is smooth222In general, Riπe´t/n are locally constant without the smoothness of B. See Lemma 2.12.. Thus, the representation r factors through a morphism

π1e´t(B)GL(Pic(𝒳η¯))

along the natural surjection Gal(k(η¯)/k(η))π1e´t(B). Then, by the Hermite–Minkowski type theorem (see Lemma 5.3), we may take a finite étale morphism BB from a complex smooth variety such that for any 𝒳η in (5.1),

L:-Pic𝒳η/η(η)=Pic(𝒳η¯).

Here, η is the generic point of B. Therefore, in this case, the set (5.1) is bijective to the following set

LNSShaf{𝒳η|𝒳 is a locally trivial family of primitive symplectic varieties over B such that 𝒳0X and Pic𝒳η/η(η)L} (5.6)

By the argument as in [81, Lemma 4.3.1], the lower bound of the squares of MBM classes (Proposition 3.8) indicates that there exists a positive integer N(L) such that, for any 𝒳η in (5.6) with Pic𝒳η/η(η)L, the base extension 𝒳η=𝒳η×ηη admits a polarization of degree N(L). The integer N(L) only depends on the lattice L (and the deformation type of X). Theorem 4.1 and Proposition 3.11 imply that the set (5.6) is a union of finite sets. Finally, we can see that the set (5.6) is finite since NSShaf is finite by Corollary 5.6. ∎

6. Finiteness of projective models and counter-examples

Let X be a primitive symplectic variety and C a smooth connected curve. According to Theorem 5.1, X has only finitely many birational models over C. In this section, we utilize finiteness results from cone conjectures in Section 3.3 to establish the finiteness of isomorphism classes for these models. Furthermore, we illustrate with an example that the assumption of projectivity for families is essential for this inquiry.

6.1. Proof of Theorem 1.2

Let k be an algebraically closed field of characteristic zero. For simplicity, we assume (C,0) is a smooth integral pointed curve over k and X a -factorial primitive symplectic variety with terminal singularities. By Theorem 5.1, we can see there are only finitely many primitive symplectic varieties Y over the function field K=k(C), such that there is a projective locally trivial family 𝒳/CShaf(C,X) with Y𝒳K.

Let 𝒳/CShaf(C,X) be another projective locally trivial family such that 𝒳KY over K. Since C is normal, there is a Zariski covering

C=sC closed pointCs

that Cs is the localization of C at s. For any closed point sC, Proposition 4.2 implies that it can be uniquely extended to a birational equivalence 𝒳Cs𝒳Cs over Cs such that the restriction 𝒳s𝒳s is a birational equivalence. We can glue it to a birational equivalence g:𝒳𝒳 over C. By the construction, we can see g is an isomorphism in codimension one. By Lemma 3.14, the total space 𝒳 of any 𝒳/CShaf(C,X) is -factorial, and g is a small -factorial modification over C by the previous discussion. Now, we can apply Corollary 3.13 to conclude it. ∎

Remark 6.1.

Theorem 1.2 holds for pointed regular base variety (B,0) by localizing at codimension-one points.

6.2. Proof of Corollary 1.3

Note that the condition in Theorem 1.2 follows from the SYZ conjecture, which says that, on a primitive symplectic variety, the linear system of any isotropic nef line bundle induces a Lagrangian fibration, and in particular, the nef line bundle is semiample. The SYZ conjecture has been confirmed for smooth irreducible symplectic varieties of all known deformation types:

  • For K3[n]-type, see [13, Theorem 1.5];

  • for Kumn-type, see [84, Proposition 3.38];

  • for OG6-type, see [60, Corollary 1.3];

  • for OG10-type, see [59, Theorem 2.2].

Therefore, Theorem 1.2 implies that finiteness of the pointed Shafarevich set (Pointed Shafarevich problem) for these four known deformation types. ∎

6.3. A general construction of counter-examples

This last section is devoted to proving the following result.

Proposition 6.2.

There exist infinitely many families of smooth irreducible symplectic varieties πi:𝒳iC over some smooth integral complex pointed curve (C,0) satisfying that

  1. (1)

    𝒳i are isomorphic over C{0} for all i,j;

  2. (2)

    the special fibers πi1(0) are all isomorphic;

  3. (3)

    𝒳iC and 𝒳jC are not isomorphic when ij.

The main ingredient is that birational pairs of smooth irreducible symplectic varieties are non-separated points in the moduli space. More precisely, we have the following result, which is a mild strengthening of [35, Theorem 4.6], [73, Proposition 2.1] and [11, Theorem 6.16].

Proposition 6.3.

Let X be a -factorial terminal irreducible symplectic variety with b2(X)4, and L a very ample line bundle on X. There exists a smooth integral complex pointed curve (C,0) such that for any birational map Ψ:XX to a -factorial irreducible symplectic variety X with terminal singularities, there are locally trivial families of primitive symplectic varieties with Picard number one at the geometric generic fibers:

π1:𝒳1C,π2:𝒳2C

that are isomorphic over C=C{0}, and endowed with line bundles i on 𝒳i with

1|𝒳C2|𝒳C,1|π11(0)L, and 2|π21(0)Ψ(L).
Proof.

The statement follows from the argument in [73, Proposition 2.1], which we sketch here. Denote by Λ the Beauville–Bogomolov lattice H2(X,)tf. There exists a universal deformation

π:𝒳Deflt(X),

where Deflt(X) is the Kuranishi space of deformations of X. By Proposition 2.18 (or [14]), there is a period map 𝒫:Deflt(X)ΩΛ, which is a local isomorphism. The birational transformation Ψ induces a Hodge isometry

Ψ:H2(X,)trH2(X,)tr.

Any Λ-marking φ:H2(X,)tfΛ induces a Λ-marking φφΨ on X. Under this marking, one can also define a period map 𝒫:Deflt(X)ΩΛ and 𝒫(0)=𝒫(0) in ΩΛ.

Denote Deflt(X,L) for the Kuranishi space of deformations of pairs (X,L). It is a closed subspace of Deflt(X) of dimension b23 given by a smooth hypersurface by [35, 1.14]. Let i:Xn be an embedding associated with L, and 𝐇𝐢𝐥𝐛nX the Hilbert scheme parametrizing closed subschemes in n which are deformation equivalent to X. Up to shrinking Deflt(X,L), there exists an analytic open subset Wan𝐇𝐢𝐥𝐛nX,an with a proper surjective map of complex analytic spaces

WanDeflt(X,L).

One can find a smooth integral complex pointed curve (C,0) together with a morphism g:C𝐇𝐢𝐥𝐛nX with g(0)=X. This gives a family

πC:𝒳CC

by pulling back the universal family on 𝐇𝐢𝐥𝐛nX. We may assume that πC is a family of smooth irreducible symplectic varieties. Moreover, we may assume that 𝒳C,t is of Picrad rank 1 for general tC.

We put Can:=g1(Wan), and let πCan:𝒳CanCan be the restriction of πC. Let LPic(X) be Ψ(L). Note that, L is not necessarily a polarization (it is a polarization if and only if Ψ is an isomorphism). We can identify Deflt(X,L)Deflt(X,L) via the period maps 𝒫𝒫1 (after possibly a shrinking). Note that, under this identification, one get another family π:𝒳Deflt(X,L) whose central fiber over 0 is X. Let πCan:𝒳CanCan be the restriction of π. Note that the fibers of πCan are all projective by the projectivity criterion ([36, Theorem 2]) since they have positive line bundle. The argument in [73, Claim 2.2] shows that there is a birational map

Ψt:𝒳Can,t𝒳Can,t

for general tCan and the specialization of the Hodge isometry

Ψt:H2(𝒳Can,t,)H2(𝒳Can,t,) (6.1)

to the special fiber is Ψ:H2(𝒳0,)H2(𝒳0,). Moreover, by the argument after [73, Claim 2.2], 𝒳|Can, is isomorphic to 𝒳|Can, after shrinking Can.

Define a complex manifold 𝒳C by gluing 𝒳Can into 𝒳CX along the isomorphism 𝒳Can,𝒳Can,. Then 𝒳C is a Zariski open subset of 𝒳C¯ that is a Moishezon space obtained by gluing 𝒳C¯X with 𝒳 along 𝒳X, where 𝒳C¯ is a closure of 𝒳 in any projective embedding. By Artin’s theorem ([8, Theorem 7.3]), 𝒳C is an algebraic space. Let 1 on 𝒳1 be the restriction of 𝒪(1), which is a universal line bundle over 𝐇𝐢𝐥𝐛nX. Let 𝒳2 be the closure of the restriction of 1|𝒳1X to 𝒳2X. Then by construction, 2 specializes to L. It finishes the proof. ∎

Proof of Proposition 6.2

Here we give a construction based on the example given in [30], which has infinitely many distinct flops ΨiBir(X).

Let Y5 be a smooth cubic fourfold containing a cubic scroll S. Set

Hdg(Y)=H2,2(Y,)H4(Y,).

Choose Y to be general such that Hdg(Y) is generated by the classes [H2] and [S]. Let X be the Fano variety of lines in Y. The incidence correspondence induces a map

α:H4(Y,)H2(X,).

Set L=α([H2]) and =α([S]). Note that L is an ample class on X; in fact it is proportional to the Plücker polarization. Then the Néron–Severi lattice of X under the Beauville–Bogomolov form is given by

NS(X)=(LL6662).

See [30, §7]. There are no isotropic integral classes and (2)-classes in NS(X). By [30, Proposition 7.2], the nef cone Nef(X)NS(X) is

Conv(7L3,L+3).

As shown in [30, Theorem 7.4], there is a flop ΨBir(X) of infinite order, whose action on NS(X) is

Ψ(L) =11L6, (6.2)
Ψ() =2L

So we can apply Proposition 6.3 to the self birational maps for all i,

ΨiΨΨi times:XX

to obtain infinitely many algebraic families 𝒳iC. For any ij, we have

Ψi(Amp(X))Ψj(Amp(X))= (6.3)

inside the movable cone Mov¯(X).

Now we show that 𝒳iC are distinct families. Assume, for contradiction, that there exists an isomorphism of families

𝒳i𝒳jCCϕidC

for some ij. Since the generic fiber has Picard number one, by restricting to the special fiber, one can obtain an automorphism ϕ0:XX whose action on NS(X) satisfies

Ψi,(L)=spi(ϕ(j,η¯))=ϕ0,spj(j,η¯)=ϕ0,Ψj,(L),

where spi and spj are specialization of Néron–Severi lattices along these two families respectively. Since ϕ0, clearly preserves the decomposition of the movable cone of X into ample chambers, this contradicts (6.3).

Declaration

Funding

L. Fu is supported by the University of Strasbourg Institute for Advanced Study (USIAS), by the Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) under projects ANR-20-CE40-0023 and ANR-24-CE40-4098, and by the CNRS project International Emerging Actions (IEA). Z. Li is supported by NSFC grant (No. 12425105, No. and No. 12171090) and Shanghai Pilot Program for Basic Research (No. 21TQ00). Zhiyuan is also a member of LMNS. T. Takamatsu is supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Numbers JP22KJ1780 and JP25K17228. H. Zou is supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) – Project-ID 491392403 – TRR 358.

Conflict of interest

The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

References

  • [1] E. Amerik and M. Verbitsky (2017) Morrison-Kawamata cone conjecture for hyperkähler manifolds. Ann. Sci. Éc. Norm. Supér. (4) 50 (4), pp. 973–993. External Links: ISSN 0012-9593,1873-2151, Document, Link, MathReview (Fei Hu) Cited by: §3.2, §3.2, §3.
  • [2] E. Amerik and M. Verbitsky (2020) Collections of orbits of hyperplane type in homogeneous spaces, homogeneous dynamics, and hyperkähler geometry. Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN (1), pp. 25–38. External Links: ISSN 1073-7928,1687-0247, Document, Link, MathReview (Paul E. Gunnells) Cited by: §2.4.
  • [3] E. Amerik and M. Verbitsky (2022) MBM classes and contraction loci on low-dimensional hyperkähler manifolds of K3[n] type. Algebr. Geom. 9 (3), pp. 252–265. External Links: ISSN 2313-1691,2214-2584, Document, Link, MathReview (Justin Sawon) Cited by: Example 3.7.
  • [4] Y. André (1996) On the Shafarevich and Tate conjectures for hyper-Kähler varieties. Math. Ann. 305 (2), pp. 205–248. External Links: ISSN 0025-5831,1432-1807, Document, Link, MathReview (Claire Voisin) Cited by: 2nd item, §1.4.
  • [5] S. Ju. Arakelov (1971) Families of algebraic curves with fixed degeneracies. Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR Ser. Mat. 35, pp. 1269–1293. External Links: ISSN 0373-2436, MathReview (J. W. S. Cassels) Cited by: §1.1.
  • [6] M. Artin (1968) On the solutions of analytic equations. Invent. Math. 5, pp. 277–291. External Links: ISSN 0020-9910,1432-1297, Document, Link, MathReview (Joseph Lipman) Cited by: §2.2.
  • [7] M. Artin (1969) Algebraic approximation of structures over complete local rings. Inst. Hautes Études Sci. Publ. Math. (36), pp. 23–58. External Links: ISSN 0073-8301,1618-1913, Link, MathReview (H. Kurke) Cited by: §2.2.
  • [8] M. Artin (1970) Algebraization of formal moduli. II. Existence of modifications. Ann. of Math. (2) 91, pp. 88–135. External Links: ISSN 0003-486X, Document, Link, MathReview (H. Kurke) Cited by: §6.3.
  • [9] B. Bakker, Y. Brunebarbe, and J. Tsimerman (2023) O-minimal GAGA and a conjecture of Griffiths. Invent. Math. 232 (1), pp. 163–228. External Links: ISSN 0020-9910,1432-1297, Document, Link, MathReview Entry Cited by: §4.3.
  • [10] B. Bakker, H. Guenancia, and C. Lehn (2022) Algebraic approximation and the decomposition theorem for Kähler Calabi-Yau varieties. Invent. Math. 228 (3), pp. 1255–1308. External Links: ISSN 0020-9910,1432-1297, Document, Link, MathReview (Arpan Saha) Cited by: item a, Remark 2.10.
  • [11] B. Bakker and C. Lehn (2022) The global moduli theory of symplectic varieties. J. Reine Angew. Math. 790, pp. 223–265. External Links: ISSN 0075-4102,1435-5345, Document, Link, MathReview Entry Cited by: item a, §2.1, §2.1, §2.2, §2.4, §2.4, §2.4, Proposition 2.18, Remark 2.2, §3.2, §3.2, item 2, §4.3, §4.3, §4.4, §6.3.
  • [12] A. Bayer, B. Hassett, and Y. Tschinkel (2015) Mori cones of holomorphic symplectic varieties of K3 type. Ann. Sci. Éc. Norm. Supér. (4) 48 (4), pp. 941–950. External Links: ISSN 0012-9593,1873-2151, Document, Link, MathReview (Tyler L. Kelly) Cited by: Example 3.7.
  • [13] A. Bayer and E. Macrì (2014) MMP for moduli of sheaves on K3s via wall-crossing: nef and movable cones, Lagrangian fibrations. Invent. Math. 198 (3), pp. 505–590. External Links: ISSN 0020-9910,1432-1297, Document, Link, MathReview (Francesco Sala) Cited by: Example 3.7, 1st item.
  • [14] A. Beauville (1983) Variétés Kähleriennes dont la première classe de Chern est nulle. J. Differential Geom. 18 (4), pp. 755–782. External Links: ISSN 0022-040X,1945-743X, Link, MathReview (N. J. Hitchin) Cited by: §2.1, §6.3.
  • [15] A. Beauville (2000) Symplectic singularities. Invent. Math. 139 (3), pp. 541–549. External Links: ISSN 0020-9910,1432-1297, Document, Link, MathReview (Marko Roczen) Cited by: §2.1, Remark 2.2.
  • [16] W.P. Bindt (2021) Hyperkähler varieties and their relation to shimura stacks. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Amsterdam. Cited by: Remark 3.2, §4.2.
  • [17] R. E. Borcherds, L. Katzarkov, T. Pantev, and N. I. Shepherd-Barron (1998) Families of K3 surfaces. J. Algebraic Geom. 7 (1), pp. 183–193. External Links: ISSN 1056-3911,1534-7486, MathReview (Mark Gross) Cited by: §5.3.
  • [18] M. Bright, A. Logan, and R. van Luijk (2020) Finiteness results for K3 surfaces over arbitrary fields. Eur. J. Math. 6 (2), pp. 336–366. External Links: ISSN 2199-675X,2199-6768, Document, Link, MathReview (Christian Liedtke) Cited by: §3.
  • [19] L. Caporaso (2002) On certain uniformity properties of curves over function fields. Compositio Math. 130 (1), pp. 1–19. External Links: ISSN 0010-437X,1570-5846, Document, Link, MathReview (Carlo Gasbarri) Cited by: §1.4.
  • [20] G. Faltings (1983) Endlichkeitssätze für abelsche Varietäten über Zahlkörpern. Invent. Math. 73 (3), pp. 349–366. External Links: ISSN 0020-9910,1432-1297, Document, Link, MathReview (James Milne) Cited by: §1.1.
  • [21] G. Faltings, G. Wüstholz, F. Grunewald, N. Schappacher, and U. Stuhler (1992) Rational points. Third edition, Aspects of Mathematics, Vol. E6, Friedr. Vieweg & Sohn, Braunschweig. Note: Papers from the seminar held at the Max-Planck-Institut für Mathematik, Bonn/Wuppertal, 1983/1984, With an appendix by Wüstholz External Links: ISBN 3-528-28593-1, Document, Link, MathReview (Kenneth A. Ribet) Cited by: 1st item, §1.2.
  • [22] A. Faucher (2025) The cone conjecture for primitive symplectic varieties over a field of characteristic zero and an application. External Links: 2512.19656, Link Cited by: §3.2.
  • [23] H. Flenner and S. Kosarew (1987) On locally trivial deformations. Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci. 23 (4), pp. 627–665. External Links: ISSN 0034-5318,1663-4926, Document, Link, MathReview (Ciprian Borcea) Cited by: §2.2.
  • [24] L. Fu, Z. Li, T. Takamatsu, and H. Zou (2022) Unpolarized shafarevich conjectures for hyper-kähler varieties. Note: arXiv:2203.10391, to appear in Algebraic Geometry External Links: 2203.10391 Cited by: §1.1, §1.2, §1.4, §1.5, §4.1, §4.1, §4.4, §4, §5.1, §5.1, §5.2.
  • [25] L. Fu and G. Menet (2021) On the Betti numbers of compact holomorphic symplectic orbifolds of dimension four. Math. Z. 299 (1-2), pp. 203–231. External Links: ISSN 0025-5874,1432-1823, Document, Link, MathReview (Jimmy Dillies) Cited by: Example 2.5.
  • [26] A. Fujiki (1983) On primitively symplectic compact Kähler V-manifolds of dimension four. In Classification of algebraic and analytic manifolds (Katata, 1982), Progr. Math., Vol. 39, pp. 71–250. External Links: ISBN 0-8176-3137-2, MathReview (Daniel Barlet) Cited by: §2.1, Example 2.5.
  • [27] C. Gachet, H. Lin, I. Stenger, and L. Wang (2024) The effective cone conjecture for calabi–yau pairs. External Links: 2406.07307, Link Cited by: Remark 3.10.
  • [28] D. Greb, S. Kebekus, and T. Peternell (2016) Singular spaces with trivial canonical class. In Minimal models and extremal rays (Kyoto, 2011), Adv. Stud. Pure Math., Vol. 70, pp. 67–113. External Links: ISBN 978-4-86497-036-5, Document, Link, MathReview (Julien Keller) Cited by: item 2.
  • [29] M. Hanamura (1987) On the birational automorphism groups of algebraic varieties. Compositio Math. 63 (1), pp. 123–142. External Links: ISSN 0010-437X,1570-5846, Link, MathReview (Eckart Viehweg) Cited by: item 3, §2.1.
  • [30] B. Hassett and Y. Tschinkel (2010) Flops on holomorphic symplectic fourfolds and determinantal cubic hypersurfaces. J. Inst. Math. Jussieu 9 (1), pp. 125–153. External Links: ISSN 1474-7480,1475-3030, Document, Link, MathReview (Thomas Eckl) Cited by: Example 3.7, §6, §6.
  • [31] G. Heier (2004) Uniformly effective Shafarevich conjecture on families of hyperbolic curves over a curve with prescribed degeneracy locus. J. Math. Pures Appl. (9) 83 (7), pp. 845–867. External Links: ISSN 0021-7824, Document, Link, MathReview (Flaminio Flamini) Cited by: §1.4.
  • [32] G. Heier (2013) Uniformly effective boundedness of Shafarevich conjecture-type. J. Reine Angew. Math. 674, pp. 99–111. External Links: ISSN 0075-4102,1435-5345, Document, Link, MathReview (Sean Lawton) Cited by: §1.4.
  • [33] H. Hironaka (1975) Triangulations of algebraic sets. In Algebraic geometry (Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., Vol. 29, Humboldt State Univ., Arcata, Calif., 1974), Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., Vol. Vol. 29, pp. 165–185. External Links: MathReview (Andre Galligo) Cited by: §5.1.
  • [34] A. Höring, G. Pacienza, and Z. Xie (2024) On the relative cone conjecture for families of ihs manifolds. External Links: 2410.11987, Link Cited by: item c, §3.3, §3.3, §3.3.
  • [35] D. Huybrechts (1999) Compact hyper-Kähler manifolds: basic results. Invent. Math. 135 (1), pp. 63–113. External Links: ISSN 0020-9910,1432-1297, Document, Link, MathReview (I. Dolgachev) Cited by: §2.1, §6.3, §6.3.
  • [36] D. Huybrechts (2003) Erratum: “Compact hyper-Kähler manifolds: basic results” [Invent. Math. 135 (1999), no. 1, 63–113; MR1664696 (2000a:32039)]. Invent. Math. 152 (1), pp. 209–212. External Links: ISSN 0020-9910,1432-1297, Document, Link, MathReview Entry Cited by: §6.3.
  • [37] A. Javanpeykar and D. Litt (2024) Integral points on algebraic subvarieties of period domains: from number fields to finitely generated fields. Manuscripta Math. 173 (1-2), pp. 23–44. External Links: ISSN 0025-2611,1432-1785, Document, Link, MathReview Entry Cited by: §1.1, §1.1, §4.4, §5.2.
  • [38] A. Javanpeykar, S. Lu, R. Sun, and K. Zuo (2023) Finiteness of pointed maps to moduli spaces of polarized varieties. External Links: arXiv:2310.06784, Link Cited by: §1.1.
  • [39] A. Javanpeykar, R. Sun, and K. Zuo (2020) The shafarevich conjecture revisited: finiteness of pointed families of polarized varieties. External Links: arXiv:2005.05933 Cited by: §1.1.
  • [40] A. Javanpeykar ([2020] ©2020) The Lang-Vojta conjectures on projective pseudo-hyperbolic varieties. In Arithmetic geometry of logarithmic pairs and hyperbolicity of moduli spaces—hyperbolicity in Montréal, CRM Short Courses, pp. 135–196. External Links: ISBN 978-3-030-49863-4; 978-3-030-49864-1, Document, Link, MathReview Entry Cited by: §1.1, §1.1.
  • [41] D. Kaledin, M. Lehn, and Ch. Sorger (2006) Singular symplectic moduli spaces. Invent. Math. 164 (3), pp. 591–614. External Links: ISSN 0020-9910,1432-1297, Document, Link, MathReview (Carlo Giovanni Madonna) Cited by: item 3.
  • [42] L. Kamenova and C. Lehn (2024) Non-hyperbolicity of holomorphic symplectic varieties. External Links: 2212.11411, Link Cited by: Example 2.5.
  • [43] M. Kapustka, G. Mongardi, G. Pacienza, and P. Pokora (2019) On the boucksom-zariski decomposition for irreducible symplectic varieties and bounded negativity. arXiv preprint arXiv:1911.03367. Cited by: §3.2, §3.3.
  • [44] M. Kneser (2002) Quadratische Formen. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. Note: Revised and edited in collaboration with Rudolf Scharlau External Links: ISBN 3-540-64650-7, Document, Link, MathReview Entry Cited by: §4.3.
  • [45] J. Kollár and T. Matsusaka (1983) Riemann-Roch type inequalities. Amer. J. Math. 105 (1), pp. 229–252. External Links: ISSN 0002-9327,1080-6377, Document, Link, MathReview (Daniel Comenetz) Cited by: item 1.
  • [46] J. Kollár and S. Mori (1992) Classification of three-dimensional flips. J. Amer. Math. Soc. 5 (3), pp. 533–703. External Links: ISSN 0894-0347,1088-6834, Document, Link, MathReview (Ulf Persson) Cited by: §2.3, §3.3.
  • [47] J. Kollár (1985) Toward moduli of singular varieties. Compositio Math. 56 (3), pp. 369–398. External Links: ISSN 0010-437X,1570-5846, Link, MathReview (Daniel Comenetz) Cited by: §4.1.
  • [48] J. Kollár (2023) Families of varieties of general type. Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics, Vol. 231, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Note: With the collaboration of Klaus Altmann and Sándor J. Kovács External Links: ISBN 978-1-009-34610-8, MathReview (Chenyang Xu) Cited by: §3.1.
  • [49] S. J. Kovács and M. Lieblich (2011) Erratum for Boundedness of families of canonically polarized manifolds: a higher dimensional analogue of Shafarevich’s conjecture [mr2726098]. Ann. of Math. (2) 173 (1), pp. 585–617. External Links: ISSN 0003-486X,1939-8980, Document, Link, MathReview (Valmecir A. Bayer) Cited by: §1.4.
  • [50] C. Lehn, G. Mongardi, and G. Pacienza (2024) The Morrison-Kawamata cone conjecture for singular symplectic varieties. Selecta Math. (N.S.) 30 (4), pp. Paper No. 79, 36. External Links: ISSN 1022-1824,1420-9020, Document, Link, MathReview Entry Cited by: §3.2, §3.2, §3.2, §3.2, §3.
  • [51] Z. Li and H. Zhao (2025) On the relative Morrison–Kawamata cone conjecture. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (3) 131 (5), pp. Paper No. e70099. External Links: ISSN 0024-6115,1460-244X, Document, Link, MathReview Entry Cited by: item c, §3.3.
  • [52] Z. Li (2023) On the relative Morrison-Kawamata cone conjecture (II). External Links: arXiv:2309.04673, Link Cited by: item c, §3.3.
  • [53] Y. Liu, Z. Liu, and C. Xu (2025) Irreducible symplectic varieties with a large second Betti number. J. Reine Angew. Math. 825, pp. 1–31. External Links: ISSN 0075-4102,1435-5345, Document, Link, MathReview Entry Cited by: Example 2.4, §5.3.
  • [54] S. Lojasiewicz (1964) Triangulation of semi-analytic sets. Ann. Scuola Norm. Sup. Pisa Cl. Sci. (3) 18, pp. 449–474. External Links: ISSN 0391-173X, MathReview (S. S. Cairns) Cited by: §5.1.
  • [55] S. Lyu and T. Murayama (2022) The relative minimal model program for excellent algebraic spaces and analytic spaces in equal characteristic zero. arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.08732. Cited by: item 1, item 2, §2.3.
  • [56] E. Markman and K. Yoshioka (2015) A proof of the Kawamata-Morrison cone conjecture for holomorphic symplectic varieties of K3[n] or generalized Kummer deformation type. Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN (24), pp. 13563–13574. External Links: ISSN 1073-7928,1687-0247, Document, Link, MathReview (Florian Schrack) Cited by: §3.2, §3.
  • [57] E. Markman (2011) A survey of Torelli and monodromy results for holomorphic-symplectic varieties. In Complex and differential geometry, Springer Proc. Math., Vol. 8, pp. 257–322. External Links: ISBN 978-3-642-20299-5, Document, Link, MathReview (Kieran G. O’Grady) Cited by: §3.2, §3, §4.3.
  • [58] T. Matsusaka (1986) On polarized normal varieties. I. Nagoya Math. J. 104, pp. 175–211. External Links: ISSN 0027-7630,2152-6842, Document, Link, MathReview (Daniel Comenetz) Cited by: §4.2.
  • [59] G. Mongardi and C. Onorati (2022) Birational geometry of irreducible holomorphic symplectic tenfolds of O’Grady type. Math. Z. 300 (4), pp. 3497–3526. External Links: ISSN 0025-5874,1432-1823, Document, Link, MathReview (Chen Jiang) Cited by: 4th item.
  • [60] G. Mongardi and A. Rapagnetta (2021) Monodromy and birational geometry of O’Grady’s sixfolds. J. Math. Pures Appl. (9) 146, pp. 31–68. External Links: ISSN 0021-7824,1776-3371, Document, Link, MathReview (Alex Degtyarev) Cited by: 3rd item.
  • [61] G. Mongardi (2015) A note on the Kähler and Mori cones of hyperkähler manifolds. Asian J. Math. 19 (4), pp. 583–591. External Links: ISSN 1093-6106,1945-0036, Document, Link, MathReview (Paul A. Hacking) Cited by: Example 3.7.
  • [62] N. Nakayama (2004) Zariski-decomposition and abundance. MSJ Memoirs, Vol. 14, Mathematical Society of Japan, Tokyo. External Links: ISBN 4-931469-31-0, MathReview (Tommaso De Fernex) Cited by: §3.3.
  • [63] Y. Namikawa (2001) A note on symplectic singularities. External Links: math/0101028, Link Cited by: §2.3, Remark 2.2.
  • [64] Y. Namikawa (2001) Extension of 2-forms and symplectic varieties. J. Reine Angew. Math. 539, pp. 123–147. External Links: ISSN 0075-4102,1435-5345, Document, Link, MathReview (Mark Gross) Cited by: §2.4.
  • [65] Y. Namikawa (2006) On deformations of -factorial symplectic varieties. J. Reine Angew. Math. 599, pp. 97–110. External Links: ISSN 0075-4102,1435-5345, Document, Link, MathReview (Mark Gross) Cited by: item b, §2.4.
  • [66] V. V. Nikulin (1979) Integer symmetric bilinear forms and some of their geometric applications. Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR Ser. Mat. 43 (1), pp. 111–177, 238. External Links: ISSN 0373-2436, MathReview (I. Dolgachev) Cited by: §5.1, §5.1.
  • [67] K. Oguiso (1999) Families of hyperkähler manifolds. arXiv preprint math/9911105. Cited by: §5.3.
  • [68] M. Orr and A. N. Skorobogatov (2018) Finiteness theorems for K3 surfaces and abelian varieties of CM type. Compos. Math. 154 (8), pp. 1571–1592. External Links: ISSN 0010-437X,1570-5846, Document, Link, MathReview (Yang Cao) Cited by: §1.5, §5.1.
  • [69] A. N. Paršin (1968) Algebraic curves over function fields. I. Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR Ser. Mat. 32, pp. 1191–1219. External Links: ISSN 0373-2436, MathReview (J.-E. Bertin) Cited by: §1.1.
  • [70] A. Perego and A. Rapagnetta (2014) Factoriality properties of moduli spaces of sheaves on abelian and K3 surfaces. Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN (3), pp. 643–680. External Links: ISSN 1073-7928,1687-0247, Document, Link, MathReview (Antony Maciocia) Cited by: item 3.
  • [71] A. Perego ([2020] ©2020) Examples of irreducible symplectic varieties. In Birational geometry and moduli spaces, Springer INdAM Ser., Vol. 39, pp. 151–172. External Links: ISBN 978-3-030-37114-2; 978-3-030-37113-5, Document, Link, MathReview Entry Cited by: Example 2.3.
  • [72] R. Pink (1990) Arithmetical compactification of mixed Shimura varieties. Bonner Mathematische Schriften [Bonn Mathematical Publications], Vol. 209, Universität Bonn, Mathematisches Institut, Bonn. Note: Dissertation, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Bonn, 1989 External Links: MathReview (Min Ho Lee) Cited by: §5.1.
  • [73] U. Rieß (2014) On the Chow ring of birational irreducible symplectic varieties. Manuscripta Math. 145 (3-4), pp. 473–501. External Links: ISSN 0025-2611,1432-1785, Document, Link, MathReview (Paolo Aluffi) Cited by: §6.3, §6.3, §6.3.
  • [74] J. Rizov (2010) Kuga-Satake abelian varieties of K3 surfaces in mixed characteristic. J. Reine Angew. Math. 648, pp. 13–67. External Links: ISSN 0075-4102,1435-5345, Document, Link, MathReview (Lars Halvard Halle) Cited by: §5.1.
  • [75] I. R. Šafarevič (1963) Algebraic number fields. In Proc. Internat. Congr. Mathematicians (Stockholm, 1962), pp. 163–176. External Links: MathReview (P. Roquette) Cited by: §1.1.
  • [76] M. Schwald (2020) Fujiki relations and fibrations of irreducible symplectic varieties. Épijournal Géom. Algébrique 4, pp. Art. 7, 19. External Links: ISSN 2491-6765, Document, Link, MathReview (Zhi Jiang) Cited by: §2.1.
  • [77] Y. She (2017) The unpolarized shafarevich conjecture for k3 surfaces. preprint, arXiv:1705.09038. Cited by: §1.2, §1.4, §1.5, §5.1.
  • [78] T. Stacks project authors (2025) The stacks project. Note: https://stacks.math.columbia.edu Cited by: §2.2, §2.3, §4.3.
  • [79] H. Sterk (1985) Finiteness results for algebraic K3 surfaces. Math. Z. 189 (4), pp. 507–513. External Links: ISSN 0025-5874,1432-1823, Document, Link, MathReview (I. Dolgachev) Cited by: §3.3, §3.
  • [80] T. Takamatsu (2020) On a cohomological generalization of the Shafarevich conjecture for K3 surfaces. Algebra Number Theory 14 (9), pp. 2505–2531. External Links: ISSN 1937-0652,1944-7833, Document, Link, MathReview (Yuya Matsumoto) Cited by: §1.2, §1.4.
  • [81] T. Takamatsu (2025) On the finiteness of twists of irreducible symplectic varieties. Math. Ann. 392 (1), pp. 339–371. External Links: ISSN 0025-5831,1432-1807, Document, Link, MathReview Entry Cited by: §1.5, §3.2, §3.2, §3.2, §3.2, §3.2, §3.2, §3.2, §3.2, §5.3.
  • [82] (1973) Théorie des topos et cohomologie étale des schémas. Tome 3. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Vol. Vol. 305, Springer-Verlag, Berlin-New York. Note: Séminaire de Géométrie Algébrique du Bois-Marie 1963–1964 (SGA 4), Dirigé par M. Artin, A. Grothendieck et J. L. Verdier. Avec la collaboration de P. Deligne et B. Saint-Donat External Links: MathReview Entry Cited by: §5.3.
  • [83] C. Vial (2013) Algebraic cycles and fibrations. Doc. Math. 18, pp. 1521–1553. External Links: ISSN 1431-0635,1431-0643, MathReview (Jishnu G. Biswas) Cited by: §2.3.
  • [84] K. Yoshioka (2016) Bridgeland’s stability and the positive cone of the moduli spaces of stable objects on an abelian surface. In Development of moduli theory—Kyoto 2013, Adv. Stud. Pure Math., Vol. 69, pp. 473–537. External Links: ISBN 978-4-86497-032-7, Document, Link, MathReview (Ziyu Zhang) Cited by: 2nd item.