|
Abstract. At the memorial meeting in 1995,
I gave a lecture with this title: "Tilting with Maurice". It was devoted to
fights about the relevance of concepts in representation
theory. Some participants complained afterwards that they had expected
(say as a final pun) a discussion about Auslander's contribution to
tilting theory. At that time I felt that tilting theory was
my business, not his. But I was wrong. Auslanders's ideas (quite different from mine)
have turned out to be essential for the further developments:
for example, tau-tilting is strongly based on his visions.
The second lecture will focus the attention on Auslander's aim of providing a homological theory of representations, as seen already in his early work in representation theory: the Paris lectures and the Queen Mary lectures. Surprisingly, some of his suggestions have yet been neglected, for example his proposal to look at what he called the t-torsion-free modules. Graphical visualisation (the agemo quiver, the dominance quiver) may stimulate further interest. Maurice himself never relied on visual means - it seems that this has to be my task. Both lectures will start with historical recollections. This then will be followed by a report on recent investigations of various mathematicians which correspond to Auslander's ideas. The first lecture will concentrate on the role of bricks in module categories, the second on parity features of homology groups, always with emphasis on suitable examples. |
|
|
|
Given a Dynkin diagram Δ, let Φ+(Δ) be its root poset. Given a vertex x of Δ and a natural number t, let Φt(Δ,x) be the subposet of Φ+(Δ) given by all roots a with ax = t.
The posets Φ1(Δ,x) with Δ simply laced and x a leaf of Δ are called the basic lattices. They are the lattices of the form
| Φ1(Δ,x) = Jr([p-1]⊕[q-1]) = Jr-1([p]×[q]) |
Here are the Hasse diagrams for the basic lattices.
(1)
| All basic lattices have a symmetric chain decomposition. |
(2) Let Δ be a simply laced Dynkin diagram, x a vertex of Δ and t a natural number:
| The poset Φt(Δ,x) is a product of basic lattices. |
(3) If ω is an orientation of a simply laced Dynkin diagram Δ,
let H(Δ,ω,x) be the hammock for the Dynkin quiver
(Δ,ω) given by
all indecomposable representations with at least one composition factor S(x).
Let Ht(Δ,ω,x) be the subset of all M with
precisely t composition factors S(x); this is a poset with respect to
x-full maps and
| Ht(Δ,ω,x) ≃ Φt(Δ,x) |
Jones, Korol, Szamboti, Walter: 15 years later: On the physics of high-rise buildings collapses. in: Europhysics News, Volume 47, Number 4, July-August 2016 (Europhysics News is published by EPS, the European Physical Society).